
Welcome to the Young Adults
Bible Study Course and the first lesson Does God Exist? The
questions Does God Exist? and Is the Bible True? are
two foundational subjects that are worthwhile covering before we learn about
what the Bible can teach us in the lessons that follow on from them. If we are
going to learn about what the Bible teaches then we need to know for sure that
God really does exist and that the Bible can be relied upon.
What we'll be covering in these first two lessons is background information
to help you gain a deeper appreciation and awe of the great God who has created
this universe before we move on and learn about what the Bible teaches. It is
also designed to help you to appreciate the marvellous wonders that He has created
as well as appreciate the Bible for the incredible book that it is.
The Bible tells us that we are to love God with all of our heart, all of our
soul and all of our mind (Matthew
22:37). The use of the word "mind"
in this verse means that our belief in God and the Bible is to be an intelligent
faith based on evidence, not just simply a blind faith. One of the most important
questions of all is Does God Exist? You might answer yes to that
question but how would go if someone asked you to prove it to them that God
exists? In this first lesson of the Young Adults Bible Study Course we will
tell you how.
1] Who created the universe?
·
The laws of radioactivity show that the universe had a beginning.
The most basic point to prove that there has to
be a supreme Creator is simply being able to prove that the universe had a beginning.
If there was a time when matter did not exist then a great and powerful Creator
had to have brought it into existence. The laws of radioactivity prove this
very basic point.
There are 92 naturally occurring different types of atoms which all matter is
made up of. Hydrogen is the smallest with one proton in its nucleus and one
electron circling the nucleus. Helium is the next type of atom with two protons
in its nucleus and two electrons circling around its nucleus. Oxygen has 8 protons
and 8 electrons. Iron has 26 protons and electrons and so on they go. Lead has
82 protons and 82 electrons.
All the elements with more protons and electrons than lead, such as uranium,
are unstable and break down. The nuclei of these elements are constantly losing
protons and over time they eventually turn to lead, which is the biggest of
the stable elements. We call this radioactivity. Now, if the universe has always
existed, all the radioactive elements in the universe would have long ago broken
down into lead atoms by now. So, if the universe had a beginning, how did it
come into existence from nothing? Something or someone had to have created it.
·
Hubble discovered that all galaxies are expanding so there had to be a beginning.
The UCG booklet Does
God Exist? gives this excellent explanation
of the fact that all galaxies are moving away from each other:
In the early 1900s
astronomers discovered a phenomenon known as red shift - that light from distant
galaxies is shifted toward the red end of the colour spectrum. Astronomer Edwin
Hubble realized this meant that the universe is expanding. He discovered that
galaxies and clusters of galaxies are moving away from each other in all directions.
To envision this revolutionary discovery, imagine dots of ink on the surface
of a balloon you are blowing up. As you inflate the balloon, the spots move
further from each other in all directions. Hubble and other astronomers found
that galaxies throughout the universe are speeding away from each other in the
same way. They also found that, the farther a galaxy or cluster of galaxies
is from us, the faster it is retreating.
What Hubble had discovered was that the universe is expanding outward
everywhere he looked. The discovery was revolutionary, since up until this time
most astronomers assumed that any motion by galaxies was simply random drift.
Other astronomers and physicists subsequently confirmed Hubble's observations
and conclusions. What could this mean?
John D. Barrow, professor of astronomy at the University of Sussex, England,
explores in his book 'The Origin of the Universe' the fascinating question of
how space, matter and even time began. Of the expansion of the universe, Barrow
writes: 'This was the greatest discovery of twentieth-century science, and it
confirmed what Einstein's general theory of relativity had predicted about the
universe: that it cannot be static. The gravitational attraction between the
galaxies would bring them all together if they were not rushing away from each
other. The universe can't stand still.
'If the universe is expanding, then when we reverse the direction of history
and look in the past we should find evidence that it emerged from a smaller,
denser state - a state that appears to have once had zero size. It is this apparent
beginning that has become known as the big bang' (1994, pp. 3-5).
In other words, what astronomers concluded they were seeing was the aftermath
of an unimaginably powerful event that hurled matter and energy outward in all
directions to form the known universe - thus the name 'big bang'. In reality,
what they were observing was the fact that the universe had to have a beginning
(p.9)
2] The wonders of design in the universe.
·
The Earth's tilt and rotation and its distance from the Sun are just right for
supporting life.
The Earth's axis, or the line between the North
and South Poles, is tilted at an angle of 23 degrees relative to the orbit which
the earth takes in revolving around the Sun. When it's winter in the Northern
Hemisphere the North Pole is closer to the Sun than the South Pole. When it's
summer in the Southern Hemisphere the South Pole is closer to the Sun than the
North Pole. Although not a direct factor in whether life is possible, the angle
creates the change of seasons which we are able to enjoy. Were the earth not
tilted, our climate would always be the same, with no change of seasons. If
the tilt were greater, summers would be considerably hotter and winters much
colder, wreaking havoc on plant cycles and agriculture.
The earth rotates at just the right speed. It rotates once every 24 hours which
evenly heats the planet like a chicken on a spit. The earth, at 149 000 000
km from the Sun, is also just the right distance for supporting life.
Astronomer Hugh Ross points out some of the ways earth is perfectly balanced
for life to exist: "As biochemists now concede, for life molecules to operate
so that organisms can live requires an environment where liquid water is stable.
This means that a planet cannot be too close to its star or too far away. In
the case of planet Earth, a change in the distance from the sun as small as
2 percent would rid the planet of all life...The rotation period of a life-supporting
planet cannot be changed by more than a few percent. If the planet takes too
long to rotate, temperature differences between day and night will be too great.
On the other hand, if the planet rotates too rapidly, wind velocities will rise
to catastrophic levels. A quiet day on Jupiter (rotation period of ten hours),
for example, generates thousand mph winds" (The Creator and the Cosmos,
1993, pp. 135-136).
·
The Earth's amazing atmosphere.
In
the UCG booklet Does
God Exist? we read the following
about the earth's amazing atmosphere:
Earth's atmosphere is one way our planet is finely tuned for life. No
other planet in our solar system has anything remotely like it. High in the
atmosphere, ozone blocks cancer-causing radiation emanating from the sun. The
atmosphere shields us from meteors, burning up the overwhelming majority long
before they reach earth. Otherwise they would cause great damage and loss of
life.
Our atmosphere contains a mixture of gases in perfect proportions to sustain
life. Oxygen makes up 21 percent of our air. Without oxygen, all animate life
- including humans - would die in minutes. But too much oxygen is toxic and
makes combustible materials more flammable. If the proportion of oxygen in the
air increased to only 24 percent, destructive fires would frequently break out
and be much harder to bring under control. Objects around us could literally
burst into flame.
Nitrogen, making up 78 percent of earth's atmosphere, dilutes the oxygen
and serves a vital function as a fertilizer for plants. During thunderstorms
millions of lightning bolts around the earth each day combine some nitrogen
with oxygen, creating compounds that are then washed to earth by rain, where
they can be utilized by plants. Carbon dioxide makes up much of the rest of
our atmosphere. Without it plant life would be impossible. Plants require carbon
dioxide, which they take in while giving off oxygen. Animals and humans are
the opposite, breathing in oxygen and exhaling carbon dioxide. Plant life sustains
human and animal life and vice versa in a magnificent, precise, self-sustaining
cycle (p.6).
On the subject of the ozone layer Fred Meldau makes this incredible statement:
If that little belt of ozone, approximately forty miles up and ONLY
ONE-EIGHTH OF AN INCH THICK (if compressed), should suddenly drift into
space all life on the earth would perish (Why We Believe in Creation
and Not in Evolution, p.35). Ozone blocks out the deadly long UV rays while
allowing through the short UV rays necessary for life.
·
The Moon distance and the tides it creates are just right.
Fred
Meldau in his classic book Why We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution
explains how the moon's distance and the tides it creates from its gravitational
pull are just right:
If the moon were half as far away, or twice its present diameter, great
tides would wreck most of our harbours, periodically submerge low-laying islands
and coastal plains, and drive inland a hundred miles on some rivers. If the
moon ware smaller and farther away, it would not have sufficient pull on our
tides to cleanse our harbours or adequately rejuvenate (with oxygen) the waters
in our oceans
Those who visit our seashores are fascinated by the rhythmic pounding
of the breakers against the rocky coast and the resulting splash and spray with
each incoming breaker. This rhythmic 'breathing' - for such it truly is - is
very important to the life of the sea. All animal life in the oceans must have
oxygen. The breakers, activated in part by the pull of the tides, aerate the
water, giving it a new supply of oxygen.
Both the sun and the moon affect the tides. As a matter of fact, both
the sun and the moon create 'tides' in the atmosphere as well as in the oceans!
And this ebb and flow of gravitational pull helps circulate the air in our atmosphere
(p.31-32).
·
The sheer size and power in the universe.
The
prophet Isaiah was inspired to write: To whom then will you liken God?
It
is He who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are
like grasshoppers, who S-T-R-E-T-C-H-E-S out the heavens like a curtain, and
S-P-R-E-A-D-S them out like a tent to dwell in (Isaiah
40:18-22).
Our Sun is 149 000 000 km from the earth and is 1.3 million times bigger than
the whole earth and yet there are far larger stars than our sun. Antares, in
the constellation of Scorpio, is said to have a diameter of nearly 700 000 000
km. Its diameter is nearly twice as big as the diameter of the entire circular
orbit that the earth travels around the Sun.
At the incredible speed of 300 000 km per second, it still takes light 4 years
to get to the nearest star to the earth, Alpha Centauri, which is close to the
Southern Cross. Our galaxy, the Milky Way, alone has about 100 000 million stars
in it and it is 100 000 light years wide. If the orbit of the furthest planet,
Pluto, was about the size of a coffee cup then the Milky Way would be the size
of the entire continent of North America in comparison. And yet, the Milky Way
is only one of an absolutely enormous number of galaxies in the universe. Estimates
vary but there is believed to be as many as 200 000 million (200 billion) galaxies
just like our own enormous galaxy!
Now try and think about this one. Einstein discovered that all matter is essentially
made up of an incredible amount of compressed energy. When the Americans dropped
the atomic bomb on Hiroshima which destroyed the city and killed 80 000 people,
it was done by converting some of the matter in the bomb into pure energy. The
amount of matter that was converted into pure energy to destroy the whole city
was only ONE GRAM! One gram is about the size of a garden pea
that you might eat at your dinner table.
Now if there's that much energy in that little pea, then that is how much energy
it took for God to create the atoms which make up that little pea. Now, if it
takes the power of a Hiroshima bomb to create a little garden pea how much would
it take to create a man? How much to create the earth? How much to create the
Sun? Or the galaxy? Or the entire universe full of at least 200 billion galaxies?
That's how powerful God is!!!
·
The evidence of design in the universe.
Most of the stars in the universe are orderly grouped together in galaxies,
many of which are grouped together in clusters of galaxies. How can such order
seen in the galaxies result from a random explosion as the big bang
if there wasn't a Creator to draw them together and bring order to them? Even
in the irregular galaxies there is evidence of design for the purpose of displaying
beauty, such as the amazing Cartwheel Galaxy that has been photographed by the
Hubble Space Telescope.

The Hubble telescope has also captured incredible colourful nebulas that show
beauty that is anything but random. We can see this well-ordered beauty in nebulas
such as the horsehead nebula, the hourglass nebula and the eagle nebula which
truly look like the patterns which they were named after. There is the beauty
of star clusters, double and triple stars with different colours like oranges,
violets and blues due to the different temperatures of the stars.
There is evidence
of design in a number of the patterns of the constellations. While some are
hard to make out, others are quite spectacular like Scorpio and the Big Dipper.
E.W. Bullinger in his book Witness of the Stars has put forth an
interesting theory that the plan of God can be seen in the various constellations
in the heavens. One can't help but wonder about that and the evidence of design
in the heavens when one sees the Southern Cross. Two of the brightest stars,
Alpha and Beta Centauri, point to it and seem to highlight how Christ died on
the cross to pay for our sins. Truly the heavens declare the glory of
God as David wrote in Psalm
19:1.
· Who
started the original push of the orbits of all the stars and the planets?
Fred Meldau in his book Why We Believe in
Creation Not in Evolution writes the following about the orbits of the
stars and the planets: GRAVITATION pulls the stars toward their centre
or nucleus - and toward each other. INERTIA - after once the stars have been
put in motion - keeps them in motion, and in a regular orbit determined by the
pull of gravity. By the balance between two great laws of nature, we have the
explanation of the ceaseless motion in orbits of the stars and every other heavenly
body!
But the serious thinker at once asks two pertinent questions: (a) What
or Who STARTED all this motion? Where did the original 'push' come from? Science
has no answer. The Bible Believer has the perfect answer: the Creator gave the
universe its original motion - and He is the One who keeps it going! Remember,
the universe is NOT an absolute vacuum; there is scattered through space a small
quantity of hydrogen gas, meteors, meteorites, and small particles. But be the
matter ever so small, MATTER IN SPACE WILL IN TIME SLOW DOWN AND STOP ANY MOVING
BODY. The finest pendulum ever made in the most nearly perfect vacuum man can
make, will neither START itself - nor keep going indefinitely.
(b) WHO keeps this vast machine going? The man-made satellites require
a tremendous 'push' to get them 500 to 1000 miles above the earth: but they
gradually lose altitude and will eventually fall to earth [like S b and the
Mir space station]
Obviously, Someone not only had to START this vast machine,
but Someone also has to keep it going. Again, we are forced back to GOD. The
fact is, if God should suddenly die - which is of course impossible - the universe
would become chaotic in a very short time, even though it is running smoothly
now, due to the truth of the Second Law of Thermodynamics: the universal tendency
toward decay and decline (p.57).
· The
wonders of the atom.
ALL things in the universe are made up of tiny
atoms, each a miracle of creation! These atoms are incredibly small with the
common ones being around a billionth of a centimetre in size. They are like
miniature solar systems with electrons whizzing around the nucleus. These minute
electrons dash around the nucleus millions of times per second
and the electrons revolve around the nucleus in orbits whose diameters
are about 10 000 times larger than the nucleus. They make the trip around
the nucleus several thousand million times every second.
Because the orbits of the electrons are 10 000 times larger than the nucleus,
most of the atom is empty space. Scientists say that if you eliminated
all the empty space in every atom in the body of a 200-pound man he would be
no bigger than a particle of dust (Arthur S. Eddington, in 'The Nature
of the Physical Universe'). And if the entire earth were likewise compacted
it would become a ball only one-half mile in diameter.
Fred Meldau writes the following about the wonders of the electrical charge
and the strong force that binds the nucleus of atoms together: Each proton
in an atom has a positive charge of electricity, each electron has a negative
charge that exactly balances the positive charge of the proton, with as many
electrons outside the nucleus as there are protons inside. Who put the electricity
in the atom, and balanced the normal atom so finely?
Ordinarily, like charges of electricity in different objects that are
close to each other REPEL each other; but in the nucleus of the atom God has
reversed the law of nature scientists are familiar with (called Coulomb's Law).
In the nucleus of the atom, in which all the protons have a positive charge,
instead of repelling each other, they are held together by some unknown force
of tremendous power! This phenomenon, to scientists, is the most mysterious
thing about the atom; in fact, they call it 'the basic mystery of the universe'
(World Within Atoms)'
Why does a comparatively minor change in the number of protons, neutrons
and electrons in an atom produce an entirely different element? Essentially
all the atoms of all the elements are built on the same general plan: a central
nucleus made up of protons and neutrons with an equal number of electrons revolving
around them with unbelievable speed. Why, by merely changing the number of the
protons, neutrons and electrons, does one get the different elements vastly
unlike? (ibid, p.71-72, 262).
Water is a good example of this. It is a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms
and one oxygen atom. Water is a liquid, yet it is made up of the atoms of two
gases. Both of those gases are highly flammable and when on fire they are put
out by water. Even with molecules that are formed from the same element there
can be profound differences. The element carbon in its pure form is what forms
the lead in a lead pencil yet if carbon is super-compressed by natural forces
and crystallized it produces the hardest substance known to man a diamond.
· The
harmony and mystery of the laws of the universe
In Isaiah
33:22 we read: For the Lord is
our Judge, The Lord is our Lawgiver. God is the great Lawgiver.
He not only gave laws that guide human conduct but He also set in motion all
the great laws of physics, chemistry and biology, etc. If we are in harmony
with them and obey them we are blessed. Break those laws and they break us.
Fred Meldau writes the following about the harmony of the laws of the universe:
We have spoken of the law of GRAVITATION and the law of INERTIA. There
are scores of other 'laws' in the universe that are perfect and necessary to
make up this vast universe. All students of astronomy are familiar with Kepler's
three laws of planetary motion. There are 'laws' of motion, laws of heat, laws
of light, laws of sound and all are PERFECT, never-changing, never-failing.
Rear Admiral D. V. Gallery (USN; writing in the Saturday Evening Post),
said, 'The stars in their orbits and velocities through the heavens faithfully
obey a great code of LAW. Earth's scientists can quote and explain this code
in great detail - until you ask, 'Whence came these laws?'
And scientists have FAITH in the laws of the universe. They predict the
coming of comets into our solar system years before we see the comet - then
they predict its return at some future date - and they do so unfailingly, because
the laws of the Universe are unfailing!
Prof. Einstein said in The World as I See It: 'The scientist's religious
feeling takes the form of a rapturous amazement at the Harmony of Natural Law
which reveals an Intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all
the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant
reflection'(p. 29) (ibid, p.52).
Many of these laws and the forces that govern those laws are really quite mysterious.
Take gravity, for example (Job.
26:7). Gravity is the force of attraction
that keeps us on the earth and stops us from floating out into space. Scientists
still have no idea about how this mysterious force works that draws matter together.
What is it that the earth does to put some sort of hook on us to keep us down
on the ground? The same applies with the attraction and repulsion of magnets.
We can work out the formulas that govern how strong these forces are based on
how far apart the objects are but we cannot explain what makes them work.
The law of the conservation
of energy allows us to convert one form of energy into another. In our bodies
chemical energy in food is converted to kinetic energy (movement). In cars we
convert chemical and electric energy also into movement. When we move a conductor
in a magnetic field we convert that energy into electricity. We are harnessing
the speed of electrons to give us power to do all the wonderful things we do
with electricity. The magnetic attraction in a magnetic field strips electrons
from atoms and it is this movement of electrons through the conductor, such
as in a copper wire, which does the work we need electricity for.
An example of this process in action is in a stereo system. A microphone has
a magnetic field in it and we use the faint movement caused by sound waves to
produce a small electric current in the microphone which is then amplified.
The power of the voltage matches the pattern of the sound wave. The louder the
sound, the bigger the voltage.
We can then record that sound. On a tape the magnetic particles are lined up
so their north and south poles face a certain direction. The bigger the voltage
(louder the sound) the more particles are lined up straight. On a CD the strength
of the voltage at each split second is recorded as a binary number (01
1, 10 2, 11 3, 1004, 101 5, etc.). For each 0 or
1 the microscopic pits on a CD are slightly different.
We can then play the music we've recorded. In a tape player the playing head
of a tape has a magnetic field. The more particles that are lined up on the
tape, the stronger the magnetic force will be. As the tape is played a current
(moving electrons) is produced. The voltage varies based on the magnetic force
which matches the sound level. A CD player reads in the binary numbers off a
CD and produces a current whose voltage varies according to the number read
in which matches the sound pattern.
Once we have that voltage its simply a matter of feeding that current with varying
voltage through the speakers. Speakers do the reverse of what microphones do.
We've seen how magnets can produce electricity when we move a conductor through
a magnetic field. Electricity or electric energy can be converted back to magnetic
energy. Whenever electricity is moving through something, a magnetic field is
produced which can move things. The speakers have a cone attached to a magnet.
The voltage causes the cone to move back and forth thousands of times a second
producing waves of sound which match what we've recorded. The bigger the voltage,
the further the cone is moved out producing louder sound waves.
Light is another great mystery of the universe. Sometimes it acts like a wave
and other times it acts like a particle. Light is harmless to us, yet at the
same time, it is also one form of electromagnetic radiation. Electromagnetic
waves are forms of energy that travel at around 300 000 km per second. The difference
between the different waves is their frequency - the number of peaks of the
wave that pass a point each second. Radio waves have a frequency up to a billion
waves a second. Above that frequency you have microwaves, infra-red waves (heat),
light, UV rays, X-rays and then gamma rays. All of them provide us with some
benefit. Their energy is believed to be produced by movements of electrons jumping
back and forth different orbits as they spin around the nucleus.
We mentioned before the mystery of water being a liquid that is made up of two
gases - hydrogen and oxygen. There are two things about water that make it a
curious exception to the natural laws that govern matter. Usually the colder
a substance becomes the more it shrinks. Water does the opposite. It expands
when it becomes ice because it is heaviest at 4 degrees centigrade. These amazing
exceptions prevent lakes from freezing completely solid. The evidence of these
exceptions to normal natural laws shows that there is a great Lawgiver
who can change those laws when He deems appropriate.
3] Water.
· Water's
versatility
Fred Meldau writes the following about the amazing
substance we simply know as water: We all know that a world without water
would be lifeless; but a world in which water followed the customary laws of
physics would also soon become lifeless! Water has been aptly called 'the most
uncommon of the common substances'. What a marvellously versatile substance
water is! Its molecules lock together in flinty embrace as ICE - and think of
the uses of ice in our economy. In another form water covers the earth with
a dry, protective blanket of SNOW in the winter, and piles up ton after ton
of stored water in the valleys of the mountains. It falls as RAIN to quench
the thirst of the dry earth in the spring and summer; it feeds our rivers and
fills our oceans and lakes. It shades us from the heat of the sun as vapour
in the CLOUDS. As STEAM it drives powerful machinery. Truly, water is one of
the greatest gifts of God to man. Without water there could be no inhabited
earth
Though sea water weighs 800 times more thin air, when it is vaporised
by the heat of the sun it is lighter than air and is lifted into the clouds!
This remarkable miracle makes rain possible. Did all these strange and wonderful
characteristics of water 'just happen'? Hardly. Water with all its marvellous
characteristics is one of God's creations (ibid, p.37-38).
· Water
heaviest at 4 degrees centigrade.
Water, unlike any other substance (except
bismuth) is heaviest at 4 degrees centigrade - slightly above freezing. Above
that and below that it is lighter. Because of this, ice floats and water freezes
from the top down. If ice were heavier than water, rivers and lakes would freeze
solid. This would kill all fish, prevent thawing in the spring and so upset
the scheme of things as to make life on earth impossible. Who changed the law
that cold contracts and heat expands, when it applies to water? The Creator
designed it so (ibid, p.37-38).
Ice is one of the few substances that expands when frozen. Most substances
when frozen become more dense and sink when placed in a container of the same
substance in liquid form. But not ice. Since water expands by one tenth its
volume when frozen, frozen water has the unusual characteristic of floating
on top of liquid water. When rivers and lakes freeze in the winter, they freeze
from the top down. If ice acted like almost all other compounds, it would sink,
and rivers and lakes would freeze from the bottom up. All bodies of water would
eventually become solid bodies of ice, eliminating most life as we know it
(Does
God Exist, p.7).
· Snowflakes
Another
miracle of nature is that of the unique shape of every single snowflake that
falls to ground. Fred Meldau gives us these thoughts on the wonder of snowflakes:
'A snowflake is one of God's most beautiful architectural marvels. Snowflakes
are infinite in variety and beauty - the great majority being six-sided crystals,
each geometrically perfect and differing from all others in design' (Dr Arthur
I. Brown).
Who can watch the myriads of snowflakes filter down through the winter
skies, pile up in fleckless beauty, and not know that this is God's world? Such
miracles as snow could not 'just happen'. No one but an infinite God could create
upon trillions of delicate snow flakes each winter with NO TWO OF THEM IDENTICAL!
That is a miracle of creative genius that should prove to the most sceptical
that GOD is the Master Architect who made all things (Why We Believe in
Creation and Not in Evolution, p.41).
· Cycles
in oceans
Fred Meldau gives us these insights into the amazing
cycles in the oceans that God has made: To provide oxygen, and phosphates,
to help keep the temperatures of the earth more equal, the Creator has made
the seas ost intricate system providing proper CIRCULATION. This circulation
is the result of 'the waves and currents that cause continual movement in the
waters of the sea; these are created by the wind and the weather and the rotation
of the earth (called the Corolis Effect)
also by the rhythmic movements
of the tides.'
In addition to the regular movements of water, there are at least three
LIFE CYCLES in the oceans of more than passing interest. 'In contemplating the
intricate balance of these natural forces the mind is filled with deepest awe'
(Miracle of the Sea). The first is the amazing FOOD CYCLE, beginning with the
'grass of the sea' - the plankton that grows in great abundance in the upper
250 feet of the sea waters. One miracle about plankton we must mention is: 'Plankton...make
daily migrations through depths of hundreds of feet as they adjust their environment
to the light conditions they prefer' (The World of Water). This is the Creator's
very practical plan for serving fish that live at different levels their daily
meal of plankton.
The second Cycle is the OXYGEN Cycle. All life in the sea breathes and
lives on oxygen. ALL OXYGEN IN THE SEA MUST COME FROM THE SURFACE LAYER - about
250 feet deep. In this upper layer we find this miracle: 'The microscopic plants
(in plankton, mentioned above) are busy at their work every moment of taking
in carbon dioxide and giving out oxygen, by means of the process called photosynthesis,
while at the surface itself atmospheric oxygen in taken into solution direct.'
The third life cycle is the astonishing PHOSPHATE CYCLE. Phosphorous is
of great biological significance because it is vital to life
The initial
assimilation of phosphate in the sea is largely made by algae in the plankton.
This plankton is eaten by the fish
There is [also] in the lower water levels
a steady building up of phosphates (but) there are [also] the REGULAR INVERSIONS
OF THE UPPER AND LOWER LAYERS OF SEA WATER which result in further utilization
of deep sea phosphate for plankton growth (ibid, p.48-50).
4] The wonders of design in nature.
·
Law of biogenesis life from pre-existing life.
Herbert W. Armstrong in his booklet Does
God Exist? writes the following: It is demonstrated today that
LIFE COMES ONLY FROM LIFE, and that each kind reproduces only after its kind
(Genesis
1:25). The works of Tyndall and Louis Pasteur,
in the field of bacteria and protozoa, finally demonstrated scientifically once
and for all in these more minute fields what Redi first demonstrated with larger
organisms
No fact of science stands more conclusively proved today. Life
CANNOT come from dead matter. There is not one shred of truth from science to
account for the presence of life upon the earth by any means other than a special
creation by the great original first Cause - God - who is life and the fountain
source of all life! (p.6).
Fred Meldau provides us with the following quotes from leading scientists
that support what has come to be known as the law of biogenesis:
Sir Ambrose Fleming in an address to the members of the Victoria Institute,
not only spoke of the origin of matter but also of the origin of life: 'We (as
scientists) have not the smallest knowledge of how empty space first became
occupied with the most rudimentary form of matter. Neither have we any conception
of how life originated. WE CANNOT IN ANY WAY BRING IT INTO EXISTENCE APART FROM
PREVIOUS LIFE.'
Irwin Schroe , 'Nobel Laurete in Physics' and leading atomic scientist
says: 'Where are we when presented with the mystery of life? We find ourselves
facing a granite wall which we have not even chipped...we know virtually nothing
of growth, nothing of life.' (Quoted in the New York Times in "The Greatest
Mystery of All - the Secret of Life," by emar Kaempffert) (Why We Believe
in Creation and Not in Evolution, p.273-274).
Fred Meldau comments further on the mysteries of life we see in the world of
nature: Scientists do not know how life got started in the beginning;
the gap between the inorganic elements and the simplest forms of life is infinitely
great. No one knows why life is divided into the two major kingdoms: plant and
animal. Why not all one kingdom (say, animal); or, why not more than two - plant,
animal and some other radically different form of life? No one can explain the
origin of sex: why male and female? Nor can anyone explain the secrets of heredity
or of instinct, that amazing property of animals which acts like intelligence
but is not intelligence as we know it, but which enables certain creatures to
do what man with all his intelligence can not do! (ibid, p.261)
· Viruses
The smallest and most primitive form
of life are viruses which are made up of a protein molecule and are much smaller
than the forms of life which are made of a single cell. Fred Meldau has these
things to say about these mysterious forms of life:
Many viruses are
a deadly poison. What a strange start for evolution to take, in its FIRST attempt
at creating life, to begin with a deadly poison! IF in its first step evolution
developed a rank poison, what would the second step be? and the following?
All
viruses are parasites or symbionts; they are utterly dependent on a 'Host Cell.'
'No virus has yet been grown in the absence of living cells' (Smithsonian Institute
Report, 1956). This simply means that the 'host cell,' a higher form of life
than the virus had to be created first
Viruses can be put into crystalline form resembling salt. This crystal
appears to be dead; it is dead; it can be kept almost indefinitely without apparent
change. But put it into a living tissue and something happens. The viruses start
to eat, grow and multiply, in their host cells! 'Even after repeated crystallization,
a treatment no other living substance has ever been able to survive, viruses
resume their activities and multiply when returned to favourable conditions
(host cells)'" (ibid, p.80-82).
· Structure
of cells
Let's look at the wonders of design in the structure
of cells and ask whether these complex structures could have come into being
without the aid of a Creator who designed them all:
Human cells are similar in construction to all cells, having three principal
parts: outer membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus. 'Each human cell nucleus contains
46 chromosomes, with the exception of egg and sperm cells, which contain half
as many. Even the powerful peering eye of the electron microscope cannot see
inside the unbelievably minute chromosomes. But indirect evidence indicate,
that, small as they are, they are still large enough to contain 30 000 genes
- the seeds of inheritance'
These cells are so small, it takes 8 000 of them to make an inch, and
64 000 000 of them can be put in a square inch! 'These 'bricks' (cells) from
which all living matter is made, are able to perform chemical transformations
that baffle the world's cleverest chemists, producing infinitely complex vitamins,
hormones and proteins. They perform striking feats of 'biological engineering'
- the outstanding example being the formation of the human ovum and sperm.'
There are five general types of cells in the human body - All coming originally
from the first two specialized cells: the ovum and the sperm. These cells are
(1) the nerve cells, (2) [skin] cells, (3) connective tissue (4) muscle cells
and (5) blood cells.
In general, cells in the body have two main responsibilities: their own
sustenance and reproduction, and their community responsibilities. The first
includes such responsibilities as eating and waste disposal, the second includes
the responsibilities of each cell to all others. Tiny cells in the pancreas,
for example, produce minute amounts of insulin which control sugar use by all
other cells. Fat cells store tiny droplets of oil to be used for energy for
the rest of the body (ibid, p.219).
· Bacteria
The majority of one-celled organisms are known
to us as bacteria. Like viruses, most bacteria are reliant on a host cell or
organism for its survival. Fred Meldau makes these comments on the part that
bacteria play in nature:
Bacteria, like viruses, have a predetermined, planned economy laid out
for them. In general, they were created to be scavengers 'to break down
the bodies of the dead' - so that the vital organic elements in bodies of dead
animals and plants might be returned to the soil to be used by future generations
God,
in His supreme wisdom, planned an economy in nature that works; and He gave
bacteria a definite place in His overall plan. Were it not for bacteria, and
certain other organisms, the bodies of dead animals and plants would not decompose
and return to the soil to make food for future generations - they would accumulate.
Bacteria, are constantly at work decomposing dead leaves, carcasses, manure.
etc.
'The microbes of putrefaction (bacteria) resolve dead bodies and plants
into sulphates, phosphates, nitrates, etc.,' that return to the soil, 'and so
the cycle of life is complete.' (The Great Cycles of Life). That such a wonderful
system in nature, with each form of life having its necessary function, all
working together in a state of perfect balance, should happen by 'chance' is
unthinkable (ibid, p.84).
· Miracle
of photosynthesis
The vast majority of plants have a compound called
chlorophyll. This almost magical compound absorbs light and combines with carbon
dioxide to produce the simple sugars and starch it needs to grow as well as
producing oxygen which animals need to survive. No one can explain the origin
of chlorophyll, or the amazing process of photosynthesis. "Photosynthesis
- the amazing process of the synthesis of organic compounds from carbon dioxide
and water by plants in light remains one of the great unsolved problems of biology.
(Eugene I. Rabinowitch, 'Scientific American', November 1953).
· The
miracle of living food
Herbert W Armstrong in his booklet Does God Exist? writes: No
man, with all his ingenuity and science and laboratory facilities, CAN PRODUCE
FOOD! That is, he cannot take plain inorganic matter and turn it into the living
substance we call food. But when a marvelous little grain of wheat is planted
in the ground, a plant develops and sprouts above the ground, and in some manner
too wonderful for any human mind to understand or imitate, the elements drunk
in through the roots from the ground are utilized by the life germ in the seed
of wheat, and new grains of wheat appear.
During this process, the inorganic iron and other elements dissolved in
the ground, drunk into the roots and carried up into the new grain of wheat,
have been actually converted into organic matter which can be assimilated as
food. And this same marvelous process takes place in the growth out of the ground
of all grains, vegetables, fruits and foods. When we eat animal meat we are
merely consuming, secondhand, the vegetation which the animal ate. MAN, with
all his vaunted science, his technical laboratory facilities, with all his inventive
genius, lacks the intelligence and the powers to produce a grain of wheat, or
to convert inorganic matter into living food (p.9).
· Plants
and capillarity
One
of the amazing qualities of water that God created in it is that of surface
tension. This sticking action of water causes water to rise in tubes
of very small diameter which is called capillarity. Were it not for this quality,
water could not be drawn up from the soil by plant roots and fed to all the
cells of a plant. This quality makes a dramatic difference when one considers
how water rises from the roots to the highest branches of a 400-foot tree.
"Even today we do not know the complete story of how it does this [for]
merely to raise water 450 feet requires a pressure, or tension of about 210
pounds per square inch! And in some hardwood trees water rises at the rate of
almost 150 feet per hour. A date palm in a desert oasis may need to raise as
much as 100 gallons of water a day to make up its losses in evaporation from
the leaves." (Victor A. Grenlach, in 'The Rise of Water in Plants, Scientific
American Magazine).
· Balance
of nature
Fred Meldau writes the following about the balance
in nature: All life on earth forms a wonderful unit. In nature are found
many 'checks and counterchecks' which keep the so-called 'Balance in Nature'
'Food
chains' not only illustrate the way 'balance' is maintained in nature, but also
the interdependence of all life
'The living things of a community,' says
another authority, 'form a natural balance, which is often upset but just as
often restored [such as after a bushfire]
If we consider the living world
we see a vast number of species, animal and vegetable, high and low, some numerous,
some scarce, some spread everywhere, others confined to limited parts of the
earth. On the whole, these proportions, numbers and particular distribution
of species remain constant; there is a balance maintained between them which
we wont to call the balance of nature'
The Creator's hand can easily be seen also in the many 'handicaps' and
'safeguards' found in nature. Balance in nature is maintained by the 'handicaps'
placed on certain creatures that otherwise would kill off all weaker species
Certain
'safeguards' also are given to forms of life that would otherwise be at a great
disadvantage in the struggle for existence
The presence of life on earth
in such great abundance and variety, constantly maintained in an obviously well-planned
and finely "balanced" and interdependent economy, in which plants
support animals and animals support plants, and both support mankind, witnesses
to the superintendence of a Master Mind (Why We Believe in Creation Not
in Evolution, p.105-106, 330).
· Sheer
number of different species
A species is designated as a group of organisms
that can produce fertile offspring such as a horse or a dog. Within each species
God has created tremendous variety. We see that within the different races of
mankind as well as different horses, cats and dogs, etc. These varieties can
produce fertile offspring while different species are not able to.
Animals of different species that are close enough genetically to each other
are able to mate and produce offspring but because they are different species
the offspring are sterile (A fact ignored by certain science-fiction shows).
An example of this is crossing a horse and a donkey which produces a mule. The
mule is sterile and cannot reproduce. Biologically close enough species such
as horses and those similar to horses are classified as a genus. Reproduction
is biologically impossible between species of different genera. This biological
barrier God has created is what makes evolution from reptiles to birds and apes
to humans impossible.
Evolution speculates that with long enough time it might be possible for one
genus to change to another. They believe these changes are slow and gradual
but given enough time it will happen. Given the tremendous time needed for even
minor changes evolution simply cannot account for the incredible number of species
and the incredible amount of variety within each species. Fred Meldau makes
these comments on this point:
Wherever one looks in nature, he is confronted by innumerable varieties
of life - especially in the lower echelons. There are over 100,000 known species
of fungi; 5,000 species of green algae; 3,000 species of sponges; 5,000 species
of corals and their kin; 25,000 species of crustacea (barnacles, crabs, lobsters,
shrimp, etc); 80,000 species of molluscs or shellfish; and there are over 300,000
species of plant life!
Evolution demands such long periods of time for the development of species,
by the slow processes of 'fortuitous changes' and 'natural mutations,' how can
it possibly account for such a vast number of species, and why did such an incredible
number of species evolve in the same environment? Why, if evolution did it,
did not all beetles evolve into a few primary varieties?
If it took millions of years to develop one type of beetle, how long did
it take to evolve 250,000 species? Then think of the other thousands of species
of life on earth. And remember, the 250,000 species of beetles are distinct
species, each an interbreeding population, and NOT just 'varieties'. Since science
has set the age of our earth at from four to five billion years, all evolution
must have taken place in the last two to three billion years at the most. So
the whole theory collapses in view of the vast variety of life on earth, and
the tremendous time needed by evolutionists to account for even minor changes
(ibid, p.118).
· How
insects breathe
There are some profound differences between different types of animals. One
such profound difference is that of the respiratory system between insects and
virtually all other animals. In short, insects do not have lungs. They get their
air through little tubes through the body called trachea. Carroll M. Williams
tells us the following about how insects breathe:
Flying insects require more oxygen, ounce for ounce, than larger animals
do. Insect evolution has met this demand by DESIGNING a respiratory system totally
different from that of higher animals. Our rhythmic sipping of the air supplies
oxygen to our body's cells by the roundabout route of lungs and bloodstream.
The insect respiratory system bypasses the blood and delivers oxygen directly
to each and every one of the millions of cells buried deep in the various tissues
and organs of its body. Each insect cell, in short, has its own private lung,
to keep the fire of its metabolism burning...The tracheal system embodies a
refinement of biological engineering almost past belief ('Insect Breathing',
Scientific American).
Notice her strange choice of words insect evolution has met this
demand by DESIGNING a respiratory system. How can evolution, which
relies on pure chance, design such a perfect system for insects?
· Birds
flying wonders
Birds are truly some of
the most amazing creatures that God has created. Man has always longed to fly
like a bird and it has taken man a long time to discover the principles of aerodynamics
which allow man to create machines that allow him to fly yet birds have been
gracing the skies for millions of years. They are perfect biological flying
machines and are a great witness of God's creative handiwork. On the subject
of birds Fred Meldau writes:
Perhaps in all the realm of nature there is no more, forceful witness
for Divine creation than birds. And here is the reason: There is a bigger gulf
between reptiles and birds than between most any two other groups adjacent in
the 'evolutionary ladder' - and practically all evolutionists are agreed that
'birds developed from a reptilian type of animal, and that the feathers probably
developed from scales.'
Here is a summary of the argument against evolution, when considering
the miracle of bird construction. Remember, evolution teaches the slow and GRADUAL
change of one genus into another; how then can evolution account for all the
radical differences that exist between reptiles and birds? How can evolution
account for the complete change of the covering, from scales to feathers? And
explain the many vast simultaneous changes made in body structure. For example,
many of the bones of a bird are hollow, and some have air sacs, in addition
to lungs. In birds heavy jaws and teeth (that would put too much weight too
high and too far forward) have been removed and there is provided a g
that grinds the food
Carl Welty, writing on Birds as Flying Machines, ('Scientific American'),
sums up the 'specialties' that birds have that reptiles do not have, that make
birds: 'Birds were able to become flying machines largely [because of] gifts
feathers, wings, hollow bones, warm-bloodedness, a remarkable system of respiration,
a strong, large heart and powerful breast . These adaptations, all boil
down to the two prime requirements for any flying machine: high power and low
weight'
Slight, gradual, random mutations do not account for such drastic changes
involved in 'the acquisition of flight in birds' for, to be successful, the
entire body had to be rebuilt at the same time in order to make flight possible!
The phenomenon of radical changes such as the development of flight in birds
precludes the idea of gradual change by random mutations. The only way bird
could possibly come to being is by a SUDDEN CREATION; so the gradual change
from reptiles to birds is ruled out as an impossibility
Birds are by far the fastest creatures on our planet. The streamlined
peregrine falcon can dive on its prey at speeds up to 180 miles an hour (some
authorities say 250 miles an hour). And yet their great speed is under perfect
control! The African eagle, swooping down at its prey at a speed of over 100
miles an hour can brake with such stunning skill, by spreading wings and tail
in an serial skid-stop, that it comes to a dead halt in the space of 20 feet!
The heart and lungs of birds are truly phenomenal. The heart of the bird
is the largest in proportion to its body size of any animal, and its rate of
beating, sometimes as high as 600 beats per minute, is far more rapid than man's
Birds which build their nests in protected places usually lay few eggs;
on the other hand, domestic fowl, whose eggs are used by man, lay many eggs
- obviously so designed for man's benefit!
Even the colour of eggs is well
planned by the Supreme Architect - and all with a purpose in view. Woodpeckers
lay white eggs; most other birds lay eggs with coloured or spotted shells
Birds
which lay eggs in open nests on the ground usually lay eggs with brown spots.
This makes them look much like stones and clumps of dead plants that surround
the nest. Did the birds select the colour of the egg, they lay? Of course not.
Who did then? The Great Designer, who wisely created all things (Why We
Believe in Creation Not in Evolution, p.149-151, 154, 162-163).
· Hummingbird
One
of the most amazing birds God has created is the smallest bird there is
the hummingbird. For his comments on this amazing little bird I quote again
from Fred Meldau's book Why We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution:
The smallest bird in the world is the 'fairy hummingbird' found in Cuba.
It measures only 2 1/4 inches from the tip of its to the tip of its tail, and
weighs but a fraction of an ounce. The majority of the 580 species and sub-species
are tiny birds under four inches in length. The hummingbird cannot walk (it
uses its feet only for perching), so it has to fly to get about.
Most birds are, aerodynamically, the most perfect flying machines on earth.
The hummingbird, in addition, is the only perfect HELICOPTER. His wings are
attached to his shoulders in such a way that he can poise motionless in the
air, and he can fly in any direction, forward, sidewise, down - and even backward,
a feat no other bird can do
'While hovering, a ruby-throated hummingbird
beats its wings up to 75 times PER SECOND. In addition to backward flight, the
hummingbird achieved the aerodynamic miracle of sideways flight...which it does
with no appearance of difficulty' (ibid, p.177).
· Penguins
Penguins
are another witness to how God has created animals that are perfectly adapted
for life in a hostile environment. The penguin's body is beautifully adapted
to its life in cold waters. Unlike other birds, it is almost completely covered
with feathers. Its dense coat of short, stiff feathers, overlapping almost like
scales, gives it excellent insulation against heat loss" (Why We Believe
in Creation Not in Evolution, p.171).
Emperor penguins can go without food for 100 days, an amazing adaptation perfectly
suited for such a hostile environment as the Antarctic. Parent penguins feed
their baby penguins by regurgitating food from its supply held in store in its
body for this purpose. The way they waddle around on land almost looks ridiculous
but the way they swim under water defies the imagination. There is some amazing
footage of penguins swimming underwater in the IMAX film Antarctica.
Proportional to their size, they swim underwater at unbelievable speeds like
a formula one race car.
· Sight
of hawks and owls
Another gift that some birds have, aside from
being able to fly, is superb eyesight far and above that of our own. Fred Meldau
writes the following about this amazing ability of many birds such as owls and
hawks:
An owl scans the dark woods with eyes ten times as sensitive to light
as ours. Most birds have prodigious eyesight. In some birds the eyes are so
big in relation to the head that there is scarcely room for them in the skull!
Nature has also endowed them with a third eyelid that can be drawn back and
forth across their eyes as a 'windshield wiper' as they rush through the high
sky, constantly encountering bits of dust and other irritants. One of the outstanding
miracles of the eyes of birds is their remarkable 'telescopic adaptability'
for rapid adjustment.
The swallow, darting swiftly through the air, is able to see the tiniest
insect as it sweeps down through the sky. A bird of prey, even at high altitude,
can perceive a small object far below and in its lightning descent (its eyes
constantly change focus), that it is able to snatch its prey without a crash
landing'(p.269, "Miracles of Science) (ibid, p.155).
· Sonar
of bats
The only mammals that truly fly are bats. Their
amazing specialized feature is their unique sonar system that allows them to
fly without eyesight and find their food by the echoes of their high-pitched
squeaks. Donald R. Griffin, Professor of Zoology at Harvard says the following
about "Bat Sonar":
"In these days of technological
triumphs it is well to remind ourselves that living mechanisms are often incomparably
more efficient than their artificial imitations. There is no better illustration
of this than the sonar system of bats. Ounce for ounce and watt for watt, it
is billions of times more efficient and more sensitive than the radars and sonars
contrived by man. To appreciate the precision of the bats' echo-location system
we must consider the degree of their reliance upon it. Thanks to sonar, an insect-eating
bat can get along perfectly well without eyesight
Bats easily find insects
in the dark of night, even when the insects emit no sound that can be heard
by human ears. A bat will catch hundreds of soft-bodied, silent-flying moths
or gnats in a single hour (simply by the use of its sonar system) (Scientific
American, July 1953).
· The
jumping ability of grasshoppers and fleas
Another amazing feature of mechanical design in
the world of nature is that of the jumping ability of grasshoppers and fleas.
The grasshopper's jump is one of the most remarkable performances in the
biological world. The little animal can leap about 10 times its body length
in a vertical jump or 20 times its length (almost one metre) horizontally
(Why We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution, p.101). Fleas are not much more
than 1 mm in length and yet they can jump as far as 30 cm or nearly 300 times
their length.
· Bioluminescence
In 1879 Thomas Edison invented the electric light
bulb yet in nature many creatures give off their own luminous light. Fred Meldau
makes these comments on this phenomena in nature:
In the flash of fireflies on a warm summer evening, in the greenish-white
phosphorescence in the wake of an ocean-going vessel, in the glow of luminous
bacteria on a piece of old meat, in the weird lights on the railroad worm and
the cucujo beetle, one witnesses the miracle of bioluminescence - a 'cold light'
that man can not duplicate. 'Cucujo is a West Indies firefly having three luminous
organs: one on the under side of the abdomen, and two on the rear of the first
segment of the thorax. It produces one of the brightest natural lights in the
world' (Science Digest)
The miracle of luminescence is found at all levels
of the ocean. 'Bioluminescence,' comments H.M. Andrews (see when Nature Lights
Up), 'is all around us, yet remains something of a scientific mystery'...
The deep sea creatures, strange enough in appearance, most of them, as
they are, are also able to light themselves up
In fact, if a number of
these were to gather together that place would resemble Broadway or Piccadilly
Circus at night, a sort of fairyland, for many of the lights carried by the
bottom dwellers are coloured. The pattern of lighting varies. Some species have
a row of lights along their bodies, others whole tiers of lights along their
sides, making them look like ocean liners at night, and which they can switch
on or off as they desire; some have illuminated circles around their eyes and
mouths, some illuminated heads and faces and some are illuminated all over,
some glow from inside (Why We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution, p.265,
144).
· Electric
animals
Another
amazing wonder in nature is that of electric animals such as the electric eel,
electric catfish and the electric ray. How an animal can produce electricity
the way these creatures do defies the imagination. Fred Meldau gives us this
amazing description of the electric eel:
The electric eel is a native of the backwaters of the Amazon. Four-fifths
of the length of his stubby body contains electricity-generating tissue, which
enables him to send out discharges up to 500 volts many times each minute!
The
current from the electric eel may be released from any part of the fish with
equal intensity; it is directional, having one polarity at the head and another
at the tail; the fish can regulate the amount it discharges (ibid, p.140).
· Sea
horse
One
of the most odd looking creatures in nature is that of the sea horse. For his
comments on this amazing little creature I quote again from Fred Meldau's book
Why We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution:
Mother nature outdid, herself when she assembled the sea horse. This bizarre
creature has the arching neck and head of a stallion, the swelling bosom of
a pouter pigeon, the grasping tail of a monkey and the colour-changing power
of a chameleon. It has eyes that pivot independently, so that when one eye scans
the surface, the other can be directed underwater. To top this fantastic make
up the male is equipped with a kangaroo style pouch from which the little ones
are born. This four inch long sea horse is the only fish that swims upright!
He has a special 'gas bladder' that enables him to keep his upright position.
If this bladder is damaged and he loses even a tiny bit of the gas, he sinks
to the bottom, there to lie helpless until death overtakes him or his bladder
heals (p.135).
· Platypus
Another
candidate for the most odd creature in all of nature is the platypus. One can't
help but wonder if it was created by God to confuse and confound evolutionists.
What did the platypus evolve from? Let us imagine an Evolutionists' Round
Table Discussion of this problem.
'He must have got his bill from the duck,' suggested one. 'That is obvious.'
'Think so?' asked the second. 'But a duck has feathers, not fur. It seems
to me his fur indicates direct descent from some animal like the beaver - but
then a beaver doesn't lay eggs.'
"'Wait a minute,' interposed a third. 'He's toothless and has spurs: that
could suggest an ancestry from the chicken - and remember a chicken lays eggs
too.' He caught his breath. thought for a moment, then changed his course. 'But
then, a chicken doesn't have fur either. That pesky fur eliminates descent from
either a duck or a chicken. Quite confusing,' he mumbled. But he started in
again. 'The female lays eggs, but she isn't a bird. Then, too, those poison
spurs present a problem - no other furred animal is venomous' (Why We
Believe in Creation Not in Evolution, p.125).
· Chameleon
The chameleon is the master of camouflage. It
can literally change its colour in a process which scientists still fully don't
comprehend. The Guinness Encyclopaedia says the following about this amazing
creature:
Mainly found
in East Africa and Madagascar, chameleons are bizarre-looking creatures that
have adapted superbly to life both in trees and on the forest floor. Equipped
with excellent natural camouflage, arboreal species grip branches of their pincer-like
toes and prehensile tails. Special cells in the skin may be contracted or relaxed
under nervous control, so producing a range of colours to match the animal's
surroundings.
Capable of remaining immobile for hours on end, chameleons vigilantly
watch for prey or predator. Their eyes stand out well from their sockets, protected
by bulging fused eyelids with a central round hole. The eyes can move in completely
different directions from one another, or can be rotated forward to gauge the
distance to an insect or small bird with binocular precision. Suddenly, the
chameleon's hollow tongue, usually kept collapsed on the floor of the mouth,
is shot out, mucus-laden, and retrieves the prey, returning to the mouth like
a piece of elastic (p.135). The tongue of the chameleon outstretched is
as long as the rest of the chameleon's body.
· Migrations
Another marvel of the animal kingdom are the seasonal
migration of animals to and from their breeding areas. Fred Meldau makes these
comments about the migration of animals:
Without baggage, lunch or bedding, and with no chart, compass, map or
guide - except the sun and stars the migratory birds make unbelievably
long trips, and they make them successfully, even though when first they make
the trip they have never been there before! The champion 'globetrotter' and
most renown of all migratory birds is the Arctic tern that spends six months
in the daylight in the far north and then goes to the Antarctic to spend the
next six months in the daylight there. Its annual round trip may be well over
22000 miles - for it does not make its journey in a straight line, but meanders
off its course
Birds are not the only creatures that migrate. Insects such as the monarch
butterfly and the locust take long migrations. The eel, salmon and other fish
also migrate, in most mysterious and unbelievable ways. The whale, the porpoise
and the seal find their way through water as unerringly as the birds do in the
air: and they migrate long distances (Why We Believe in Creation Not in
Evolution, p.185-186).
· The
amazing ability of salmon to find their way home to lay their eggs
Salmon
are born in shallow streams way inland from the ocean. One born they migrate
to the ocean and many circle their way around much of the North Pacific Ocean.
Before they die they begin an epic journey that is the epitome of determination
and relentless desire. They are so consumed with their journey that they will
eat nothing as they battle upstream. They are equipped with powerful tails and
torpedo-shaped bodies and they have been known to ascend falls over 10 feet.
Sometimes they can travel over 1000 miles inland bypassing hundreds of streams,
creeks and tributaries.
In the gravel beds in the exact spot in which they were born they lay their
eggs and then die. Salmon have an extremely accurate sense of smell which allows
them to unerringly find their way home. Each stream has its own distinct chemical
composition. The sense of small of the salmon is so sensitive that it can detect
one part per billion which is equivalent to a teaspoon of salt in 18 Olympic-size
swimming pools.
· Metamorphosis
of butterflies and frogs
Of all the wonders of nature probably the most
powerful witness against evolution is that of the metamorphosis that produces
beautiful butterflies. For his comments on this incredible wonder of nature
I quote again from Fred Meldau's classic work Why We Believe in Creation
Not in Evolution:
In all nature one can scarcely find anything more beautiful than the butterflies!
But before a butterfly becomes an adult it must go through a complete metamorphosis
in four stages: egg, larva (worm or caterpillar stage), pupa (or chrysalis),
and the adult butterfly. Why such a roundabout path to produce a butterfly?
If unguided nature or evolution were doing it according to Darwin's theory of
'natural selection' and 'survival of the fittest' the impractical devious route
would not have a chance. The butterfly would hatch directly from the egg as
it would seem to be the normal route. Unguided evolution in a billion years
could not even think up such an involved plan as a 'complete metamorphosis'
- much less put it into working order.
Could it be
that God, the Master Teacher, so designed the life cycle of the butterfly to
teach us a lesson? Undoubtedly, spiritual and moral truths are illustrated
in nature - and the metamorphosis of the caterpillar into the butterfly is an
obvious lesson. If the grovelling, repulsive, greedy, earth-bound caterpillar
pictures man in his lowly, fallen estate, then the transformation into the butterfly
is a lesson in the need and reality of the new birth (see
John 3:3, 5, 7).
And the butterfly, released from its cocoon, flying heavenward, is a picturesque
display of glory, speaking of the glory of the coming resurrection for the saved
of earth (1
Corinthians 15:42-44; Philippians 3:21).
The larva of the Monarch Butterfly is about an eighth of an inch long
when it is first born
Seeking a convenient leaf or stem, he proceeds to
spin a tough, flat button of silk. This amazing feat is done by means of a liquid
secretion of glands in his head
Within this dry shell the organs of the
caterpillar are dissolved; special cells are generated (in the apparently lifeless
body) whose function is to devour the organs which once worked for the caterpillar
and reduce them to a pulp a seemingly formless glob, 'a kind of soup'.
A miracle then takes place!
"Nothing remains unchanged, save perhaps its system of breathing. Jaws,
claws, claspers, pro-legs, digestive system, even the very shapes of the head,
legs and thorax disappear. Then the shapes of the head, legs and thorax of the
butterfly gradually appear upon the chrysalis case, and the first rough draft
of the coming butterfly is dimly seen on the horny case of the chitin
The
ugly grub has vanished; and in its place is a lovely winged butterfly as colourful
as a flower, and in the case of the Monarch butterfly, capable of winging its
way across an ocean! (p.297-300).
The butterfly is not the only creature that is developed by the process of metamorphosis.
Consider the miracle of frog generation.
A frog lays its eggs, yet no frog hatches, but something quite different;
not a fish, yet in certain respects resembling one, for it has gills and is
entirely aquatic. Soon the tadpole begins to sprout legs, and in a matter of
days it is a different creature! Its gills disappear, and Iungs and other organs
are formed - and presently the tadpole is transformed into a frog! Its legs
are perfected before leaving the water. It then can go on log or land without
having to 'evolve' legs and lungs (Why We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution,
p.266).
· Beauty
in nature is a witness of God's Handiwork
Not only do we find order and biological and mechanical
precision in everything in nature that God has created we also find
great beauty. Such magnificent beauty is not the work of random events but truly
the work of a master Artist. Fred Meldau makes these comments on God's handiwork:
Beauty is found
in many realms of nature: consider the exquisite beauty of many flowers, the
loveliness of many insects, especially butterflies and moths. No artist or photographer
can possibly do justice to the striking beauty of the jewel-like tones of every
shade of the rainbow as seen in various species of moths and butterflies. In
some, while in flight, the most striking is the way the colours shift and change,
varying with the angle of the light or the eye of the observer. This subtle
play of colour reflected from the wings of a butterfly is called 'structural
colour' produced by the ultramicroscope structures on the tiny scales on its
wings. Consider also the many scores of kinds of brilliant coloured tropical
fish, moving about coral reefs. There is a fascinating beauty also in the grace
of movement of fish and in the seemingly effortless speed with which they move
through the water
But of all things beautiful in the world, what can surpass the beauty
of birds? What can outdo the peacock for grandeur of display? What can supersede,
for symmetry and sheer finery the gorgeous tail of the Australian lyrebird?
Were they not real, no artist in the world could conceive such matchless beauty
as is found in the amazing Birds of Paradise of New Guinea. Some of the 18 species
have 'all the colours of the rainbow nicely blended'
Why such a vast display
of beauty in nature, especially in the world of birds? God made it so! To think
that this beauty, this endless variety of loveliness, came about through processes
of evolution, is without foundation. It is the handiwork of the Master Artist,
the One who's every movement is rhythm and who loves music and song (ibid,
p.180-181).
We could also add the beauty of gems such as emeralds, rubies, sapphires and
diamonds as well as the beauty of the colours and shape of the rainbow. The
way that white light splits up into those colours of the rainbow is another
great mystery of the wonders of creation. In reality it is actually our mind
which adds the colour. Having said that, it still is truly amazing that our
mind generates this incredible variety of colours from picking up light of only
very slightly different wavelengths.
· All
creatures are highly specialized and perfectly adapted for their environment.
We have only scratched the surface of all the
incredible wonders in nature. We could go on and on describing strange odd creatures
and highly specialized skills and organs. Fred Meldau summarizes the case against
evolution as seen in the wonders of nature:
Every form of life on earth is highly specialized and 'perfectly adapted'
to its environment and to its place in life and for the purpose for which it
was created. The cactus in the desert, the eagle in the air, the tiger in the
jungle, the whale in the sea, all function perfectly where they are. No form
of life on earth reveals any need whatever for evolution of any kind
The innumerable and highly complex 'specialized organs' such as the eye
and the ear, the sonar system of bats, the beak of a woodpecker, the tongue
of a toad, the trunk of an elephant, the spinerettes of the spider, and mother's
breast are of such a nature to be useful and functional they had to come into
being at once, and could not have developed gradually through 'chance mutations',
'random changes' or 'natural selection'. A partially developed 'beak' or 'tongue'
or 'eye' or 'trunk' is a monstrosity nowhere found in nature, either living
or in fossil form (ibid, p.330)
5] The wonders of design in man.
· The
amazing systems that work together to run our bodies
King David upon pondering the marvels of the human body and how all its systems
work so smoothly together was moved to write, I will praise thee for I
am fearfully and wonderfully made (Psalm
139:14).
Fred Meldau makes these comments on the way
the various systems of our body all work so harmoniously together:
Each of the trillions of cells in the body is a LIVING ORGANISM - living
protoplasm - and in order to carry on life processes they must convert food,
air and water into energy and tissue and food for tissue. These elements must
be changed into such a form that they can be absorbed as food and be carried
to all parts of the body. This process is called DIGESTION. Air must enter the
body to oxidize foods; this is called RESPIRATION. Altered food and oxygen are
dissolved in the blood and carried all through the body to hungry cells. The
heart pumps the blood to all parts of the body; this is called CIRCULATION.
Waste products, like the ashes of a furnace, must be removed; this is known
as EXCRETION. All of this highly complicated performance must have directing
intelligence, and this is in the Central Nervous System, assisted by the Autonomic
Nervous System. Working closely with the nervous system are the DUCTLESS GLANDS
which pour hormones into the blood stream when needed for the control of various
activities (Why We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution, p.215).
· The
miracle of conception
The way that our bodies are begotten by two tiny
cells, are then born and develop into the human beings that we are is truly
an amazing miracle.
It is incredible
but true that this amazing human body comes originally from just TWO TINY CELLS:
the female egg (ovum) and the male sperm. Conception - the instant when new
life is created - takes place the moment a male sperm penetrates and fertilizes
a female ovum. Starting with the union of these two cells, as a tiny bit of
living protoplasm, and sheltered in the mother's womb, this minute bit of life
grows, divides and redivides, and develops - until finally it grows into the
amazingly complex being called man.
Beyond doubt, this is the greatest miracle in nature, that 'a SINGLE
FERTILIZED CELL SHOULD HAVE THE POWER TO DRAW SEEMINGLY FROM NOWHERE THE 30
TRILLION CELLS OF THE [ADULT] HUMAN, having all the necessary structures and
organs that make up the body of man!
The wonder of this miracle is deepened by the fact that while all
the cells in the body started from ONE fertilized cell, the ovum, which was
itself neither muscle, nerve, blood, or bone cell, each separate colony of cells
produced by the process of division becomes an organ whose cells all have a
ponderable and demonstrable DIFFERENCE between them and the cells of any other
organ in the same body - and different from the parent cells!' ('Theory of Evolution
and Facts of Science,' p. 52) (ibid, p.214-215).
· Our
blood
Leviticus
17:11 says that the life of the flesh
is in the blood. Blood is truly an amazing substance which circulates
oxygen and other elements necessary for the functioning of the body. Fred Meldau
makes these comments about blood:
The red blood cell was once thought to be a 'dead cell' because, when
it reaches the blood (it is made in the red marrow of bones) it at once loses
its nucleus. But actually, it stays ALIVE - WITHOUT A NUCLEUS! That is a miracle
of Divine design, for to rob a cell of its nucleus is almost like robbing a
man of his heart. The chief function of the red blood cells is to carry haemoglobin
(which in turn carries oxygen to the cells), and since red blood cells can CARRY
MUCH MORE WITHOUT A NUCLEUS TO TAKE UP SPACE, GOD MADE THEM INTO LIVING 'GHOST
CELLS'. Moreover, this living 'ghost cell' is specially 'engineered' to carry
a maximum load.
'The red cells...are a particularly excellent piece of biological engineering.
They are BICONCAVE in shape (like a doughnut, with a thin section in the middle
instead of a hole), and this facilitates QUICK ENTRY of oxygen and other supplies
to all parts of the cell. If red blood cells were spherical instead of biconcave
we would need about NINE TIMES AS MANY OF THEM to distribute oxygen in the body
with the same speed.' (Eric Ponder, in 'THE RED BLOOD CELL,' Scientific American)
(ibid, p.223).
We read the following about the miracle of blood clotting in the UCG booklet
Creation
or Evolution?:
One relatively simple
process necessary for animal life is the ability for blood to clot to seal a
wound and prevent an injured animal (or person) from bleeding to death. Yet
the only way this intricate system works is when many complicated chemical substances
interact. If only one ingredient is missing or doesn't function in the right
way - as in the genetic blood disorder haemophilia - the process fails, and
the victim bleeds to death. How can complex substances appear at just the right
time in the right proportions and mix properly to clot blood and prevent death?
Either they function flawlessly or clotting doesn't work at all.
At the same time, medical science is aware of clotting at the wrong time.
Blood clots that cut off the flow of oxygen to the brain are a leading cause
of strokes and often result in paralysis or death. When blood clots, either
everything works perfectly or the likely outcome is death. For evolution to
have led to this astounding phenomenon, multiple mutations of just the right
kind had to converge simultaneously or the mutations would be useless. Evolutionists
can offer no realistic explanation of how this is possible (p.19).
· Our
immune system
God has designed our bodies with an amazing ability to heal when damaged. Part
of this wonderful immune system is the working of antibodies in our bodies.
The marvel of the manufacture and presence in the blood of 'ANTIBODIES.'
Of extraordinary interest is the story of how the blood makes antibodies to
fight disease. Antibodies are those substances in the blood which are protective
agents formed to fight infection by an invading organism
An antibody in
the blood is a modified soluble protein with properties that make it stick to
the type of or micro-organism against which it was developed. After an attack
of yellow fever, for example, antibodies against the yellow fever virus are
formed. These antibody molecules will immediately coat any new yellow fever
viruses that happen to enter the body and WILL EFFECTIVELY PREVENT THEM from
causing an attack of the disease.' (HOW ANTIBODIES ARE MADE By Sir Macfarlane
Burnet, in the Scientific American Magazine). Science and Medicine know these
facts but can explain them (Why We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution,
p.224).
· Our
amazing eyes
Of all the wonders of our body one of the most
amazing is the eye.
To bring before us the fact that the human eye is indeed 'THE WONDER OF
WONDERS' we quote
from Sir Charles Scott Sherrington's classic essay on
The Eye.
How does a pinhead
sized ball of cells (the tiny human embryo) in the course of so many weeks become
a child? Consider the story of just one individual part: THE EYE
The eyeball
is a little camera. Its smallness is part of its perfection. But this is a SPHEROID
camera which focuses itself AUTOMATICALLY, according to the distance of the
picture interesting it. It turns itself in the direction of the view. Indeed
our eyes are TWO CAMERAS finished to one standard that the mind can read their
two pictures as one. And the eye is contrived as though WITH FORETHOUGHT OF
SELF-PRESERVATION. Should danger threaten it, in a trice its skin shutters close,
protecting its transparent window
The biconvex lens is made of cells Iike these of the skin but modified
to be glass-clear, and FREE FROM BLOOD VESSELS which would throw shadows
within the eye. It is delicately slung with accurate centering across the path
of the light which will some months later enter the eye. IT IS BEING PREPARED
IN DARKNESS FOR USE IN LIGHT. In front of it a circular screen controls, like
the iris stop of a camera, the width of the beam and is adjustable so that in
poor light more is taken in for the image. In a camera this adjustment is made
by the observer; in the eye this adjustment is automatic, triggered by the image
itself!
Not only must the lens be glass clear, but also its shape must be optically
right. Its two curved surfaces, back and front, MUST BE TRULY CENTERED ON ONE
AXIS, AND EACH OF THE CURVATURES MUST BE CURVED TO THE RIGHT DEGREE, so that
light is brought to a focus on the retina and gives there an accurately shaped
image. The optician skilfully grinds his glass curvatures in accordance with
mathematical formulae. In the formation of the lens of the eye a batch of granular
skin cells are told to travel from the skin, to which they strictly belong and
to settle down in the mouth of the optic cup and arrange themselves in a compact
and suitable ball, NEXT THEY ARE TOLD TO TURN INTO TRANSPARENT FIBERS, and to
make themselves into a subsphere - a lens of the RIGHT size, set at the RIGHT
distance between the transparent window of the eye in front and the sensitive
seeing screen of the retina behind. In short, they behave as if fairly possessed!
Furthermore, the lens of the eye, compassing what no glass lens can, CHANCES
ITS CURVATURE to focus near objects as well as distant when wanted; and not
merely the lens, but the pupil - the camera stop - is self adjusting. ALL THIS
HAPPENS WITHOUT OUR HAVING EVEN TO WISH IT, without our even knowing anything
about it, beyond that we are seeing satisfactorily
The human eye has about 137 million separate 'seeing' elements spread
out in the sheet of the retina. The number of nerve lines leading from them
to the brain gradually condenses down to little over a million. They are in
series of relays, each resembling a little brain, and each so shaped and connected
to transmit duly to the right points of the brain each light picture momentarily
formed and 'taken'. On the sense-cell layer the image, has picture-like, two
dimensions. BUT THE STEP FROM THIS TO THE MENTAL EXPERIENCE IS A MYSTERY. For
it is the MlND which adds the third dimension when interpreting the two-dimensional
picture AND IT IS THE MIND WHICH ADDS COLOR (ibid, p.226-227).
· The
heart
The
heart is probably the most amazing piece of mechanical engineering in the body.
Every second over a person's whole lifetime it pumps blood through the body.
Its construction and the electrical system that drive it are truly amazing.
Fred Meldau makes the following comments about this amazing marvel of our body:
'Heart , like other striated , is made up of slender fibres.
Those, in turn, are composed of tiny fibrils. At regular intervals the fibrils
are crossed by bands
Micrographs show that heart differs from other
in two important respects. The first is that the capillaries that carry
blood to the heart actually penetrate the muscle fibres; in other
the capillaries have only been observed on the surface of the fibres. The second
is that among the fibrils of the heart are an unusually large number
of granules called sarcosomes, which in other cells are known to contain enzymes.
Dr Kirsch believes these sarcosomes give special feedings of rich enzymes to
the heart , and that, together with the deep-seated capillaries, is the
SECRET of the untiring work of the heart!' (See 'Heart ', cientific American
magazine). The heart is the most efficient PUMP in the world (ibid, p.231).
· Our
Another marvel of mechanical engineering in the
body are our . Fred Meldau makes these comments on the of the
body:
More than half the human body is 'the most remarkable stuff
in nature's curiosity shop.' We speak of ' of iron', yet the working
or contractile element in is soft as jelly. HOW THIS JELLY CONTRACTS
TO LIFT 1000 TIMES ITS OWN WEIGHT IS ONE OF THE SUPREME MIRACLES OF THE UNIVERSE.
An elaborate series of chemical and electrical events which would require hours
or days to duplicate in the laboratory occurs almost instantaneously when a
muscle contracts - the twitch of an eyelid, for example" (ibid, p.230).
· Our
hands
One of the distinguishing features of mankind
compared to animals is that of his hands which have opposable thumbs.
Some artist or musician raises the question. 'How about discussing
the HAND?' Gladly, dear friend, for the hand is one of the most marvellous of
all God's gifts to man. The hand is unique with man.
"Nowhere in the animal kingdom is there anything comparable with the human
hand...the organ that has specialised in remaining unspecialised. It is the
perfect tool-holder. The HAND, the BRAIN and human SPEECH are the three features
that distinguish man from the animals
The human hand is a very wonderful
thing and one of the greatest of its wonders is that the thumb is opposable
and CAN TOUCH ALL THE FINGERS and so the hand can grasp tools, a pen,
etc. The hand has strength, lightness and dexterity. With the hands one can
play the piano, write, paint and perform a thousand and one other actions
(ibid, p.232).
· The
ear
Yet another marvel of precise mechanical engineering
in the human body are our ears which give us the sense of sound.
"Even in this era of technological wonders, the performances of our
most amazing machines are still put in the shade by the sense organs of the
human body. Consider the accomplishments of the ear. It is so sensitive that
it can almost hear the random rain of air molecules bouncing against the eardrum;
yet in spite of its extraordinary sensitivity it can withstand the pounding
of sound waves strong enough to set the body vibrating.
The ear is equipped, moreover, with a truly impressive SELECTIVITY. In
a room crowded with people talking, it can suppress most of the noise and concentrate
on one speaker
At some sound frequencies the vibrations of the eardrum
are as small as one-billionth of a centimetre in diameter about one-tenth
the diameter of a hydrogen atom! And the vibrations of the very fine membrane
in the inner ear which transmits this stimulation to the auditory nerve are
nearly 100 times smaller in amplitude. This fact alone is enough to explain
why hearing has so long been one of the mysteries of physiology. Even today,
WE DO NOT KNOW HOW THESE MINUTE VIBRATIONS STIMULATE THE NERVE ENDINGS
(See article on 'THE EAR' By George von Bekesy, in the Scientific American)
(ibid, p.234).
· Man's
incredible brain and mind.
The major distinguishing feature between man and
the animals is man's incredible mind. We have an amazing physical brain but
it is also empowered ind that gives us emotional self-awareness and
the capacity to think, reason, solve problems, imagine, create and appreciate
art, humour and music. He can learn, remember and even forget (which is sometimes
a protective mechanism against certain traumas). He has emotions in a way that
animals don't love and hate, joy and sorrow, peace and anxiety, fear
and courage and dozens more. He has free will, a conscience and an ability to
make moral choices that are good and bad.
This amazing mind is made possible through the gift of the spirit in man that
God has put in him. For what man knows the things of a man except the
spirit of the man which is in him? (1
Corinthians 2:11). Here are a few quotes
which highlight how amazing man's brain and mind really is.
'The brain is a
mystery', said Sir Charles Sherrington, of London, 'it has been and still will
be. HOW DOES THE BRAIN PRODUCE THOUGHTS? That is the central question and we
have still no answer to it
Today, even though we are awed and even frightened
by the intellectual achievements of man's mind, the mechanisms that make it
possible are still unknown. Knowledge of the outward form of the brain is well
advanced. But what of the neuron mechanisms involved in CONSCIOUSNESS, THOUGHT,
PERCEPTION, THOUGHT, BEHAVIOUR, MEMORY?
They are unknown
The ten to fifteen billion nerve cells in [the] cerebral cortex are the
centre of operations. Each of the sense organs reports on its own lines to specific,
well defined regions of operations. Those for the eyes are at the back of the
brain, those for the ears are well down on each side, etc. All messages to the
brain are sifted, decoded, decisions are made and orders relayed to appropriate
stations of the body. IT STAGGERS THE IMAGINATION HOW EFFICIENTLY IT DOES THE
JOB
One of the most remarkable achievements of the human mind IS ITS ABILITY
TO BE CONSCIOUS OF ITSELF AND ITS FUNCTIONING. 'Consciousness' represents actually
a situation in which matter has become aware of its own existence
The greatness of the mind of man can be measured somewhat by his mental
achievements. The mind of man has conceived and created great telescopes, with
which he has surveyed and mapped the heavens, peering billions of light years
out into space. He has made microscopes with which now he actually see the atom!
He is able also to study the microscopic world as never before, and he is discovering
wonders undreamed of a century ago. He has 'cyclotrons' and 'accelerators' that
cost a hundred million dollars to construct. He has scaled the highest peaks,
travelled over both poles, and is discovering marvels in the abysmal undersea
depths. He has discovered the secrets of nuclear fission and nuclear fusion
- and he has harnessed the power of the atom. He has thrust satellites into
orbit in space - and [he has walked on] the moon. He has discovered and is using
many 'wonder drugs' and is able to travel in his jet planes faster than the
speed of sound (ibid, p.238-239, 242, 248)
Modern man can think rationally, can progress from the methods of his
forebears. He can think up new ideas, new concepts, he can imagine, he can create.
True man has the capacity to wonder about and investigate himself. He inquires
about his origin, his future. He can appreciate beautiful art, music, humour,
satire, creativity.As Pierre Teilhard de Chardin wrote: 'Admittedly the
animal knows. But it cannot know that it knows...In consequence it is denied
access to a whole domain of reality in which we can move freely. We are separated
by a chasmor a thresholdwhich it cannot cross. Because we are reflective
we are not only different but quite other. It is not a matter of change of degree,
but a change of nature, resulting from a change of state.'The vast gap
between animal brain and the mind of true man has never been satisfactorily
bridged. We are indeed unique. We have the ability to be self-aware,
and our self-awareness is the most compelling of all realities. As individuals,
we can experience our own unique self-awareness and individuality. We
possess the wonderful divine gift of a conscious existence. The human
mindthe product of the 'spirit in man' which God imparted to Adam and
all his descendantsis the great gift which sets modern man apart
(Beyond Star Wars, p.212).
6] Creation or
Evolution?
· Natural
selection only selects the best of existing traits - it does not produce new
ones.
The
theory of evolution originated with Charles Darwin who wrote On the Origin
of Species by Means of Natural Selection in 1859.
Darwin reasoned that, in nature, individuals with qualities that made them better
adjusted to their environments would tend to leave more offspring. This is what
has become known as survival of the fittest. He observed that animal breeders
were able to change the characteristics of domestic animals by selecting for
reproduction those individuals with the most desirable qualitiesspeed
in racehorses, milk production in cows, etc. He believed that this kind of selection
occurred in nature as well and the animals best suited for their environment
would become the most dominant type within a species.
Natural selection does occur in nature but it only shapes the makeup of individual
species and doesn't produce new species. Geneticist Hugh de Vries aptly put
it when he said: "Natural selection may explain the survival of the fittest
but it cannot explain the arrival of the fittest."
· Mutations
only produces varieties in the same species it doesn't create new species.
As the science of genetics developed scientists discovered that mutations sometimes
occur in the genes passed on from a parent to its offspring. A mutation is a
mistake or change in the DNA pattern passed onto the offspring by one of its
parents.
Certain geneticists who pushed the theory of evolution took Darwin's idea of
natural selection a step further and reasoned that favourable mutations could
have not only led to the development of new species but whole new types of animals.
The theory snowballed and developed in such way that rational scientists
felt that life spontaneously generated and single-celled life forms gradually
developed into many-celled organisms and through favourable mutations all the
different life forms we see on earth developed.
The real truth about mutations is that it only produces varieties in the same
species it doesn't create new species. Fred Meldau says the following:
Each species has its own kind, number and assortment of chromosomes, and
they differ from those of all other species. Every chromosome in the different
genera, 'differs from every other in size, shape, or in some other respects,
excepting that chromosomes always divide into pairs, and the two chromosomes
in each pair are identical.' So the Creator has keyed each species by means
of differing chromosomes - much like the combinations used in yale locks thus
assuring this tremendous fact: Chromosomes forbid transmutation and establish
the stability of each distinct genus.
On the other hand each chromosome has a large number of 'genes' that lend
flexibility to each species and give individuality to each member of each species.
Genes have such vast possibilities of differing combinations that the net result
in life is NO TWO INDIVIDUALS IN ANY KNOWN SPECIES ARE EXACTLY ALIKE (Why
We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution, p.89).
· The
result of mutations are almost always bad.
The other major point about mutations is that
the vast majority of mutations are damaging. In his book The Crumbling
Theory of Evolution J.W.G. Johnson writes:
Modern Darwinists have seized on mutations to provide the mechanism for
upward evolution
Mutations must be recognised for what they are, namely,
mistakes that are damaging, not constructive. In fact all forms of life have
wonderful repair mechanisms to guard the D.N.A. against the ravages of mutations,
repair mechanisms that are fundamental to the survival of living organisms.
However, some mutations slip through these defence mechanisms with usually undesirable
results. The results of mutations are diabetes, club feet, haemophilia. mongolism,
colour blindness, sickle-cell anaemia, creeper chickens, calves with deformed
jaws, fruit flies with crumpled wings or no wings, seedless oranges (not viable
in the wild), and on and on.
The hopelessness of mutations to produce evolution was confirmed by classic
experiments on the fruit-fly. Fruit flies breed rapidly. Furthermore, they were
given doses of radiation which speeded up their mutation rate by 15 000 per
cent. After long experiments involving 25 million fruit-flies, they refused
to turn into anything else (p.15-16).
John Howitt wrote: As mutations are almost invariably inferior to the
original stock this would constitute the Survival of the Unfit, whether in the
usual habitat of the species or in an unusual one (from Karl Marx as an
Evolutionist).
By dropping the barriers between species (or kinds) Darwin opened
a dream world in which jellyfish can become elephants, and a sea squirt end
up as a Shakespeare. The world welcomed the dream. Evolution is the only alternative
to Creation. Evolution suited the mood of the nineteenth century, and it suited
the twentieth century, seeking an alternative to a Creator God (The Crumbling
Theory of Evolution, p.14).
· No
intermediate (missing) links have ever found between species.
Charles Darwin himself realized that the fossil
record failed to support his conclusions though he felt, in time, that palaeontologists
might find the missing intermediate links. He wrote:
"Why, if species
have descended from other species by fine graduations, do we not everywhere
see innumerable transitional forms?...Why do we not find them imbedded in countless
numbers in the crust of the earth?...The number of intermediate varieties, which
have formerly existed, [must] be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological
formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly
does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps,
is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory
[of evolution]" (Origin of Species, 1958 Masterpieces of Science edition,
p.136-137, 260-261).
Francis Hitching wrote the following in his book The Neck of the Giraffe:
Darwin, Evolution and the New Biology:
"When you look for links between major groups of animals, they simply aren't
there; at least, not in enough numbers to put their status beyond doubt. Either
they don't exist at all, or they are so rare that endless argument goes on about
whether a particular fossil is, or isn't, or might be, transitional between
this group and that...There ought to be cabinets full of intermediates - indeed,
one would expect the fossils to blend so gently into one another that it would
be difficult to tell where the invertebrates ended and the
vertebrates began. But this isn't the case. Instead, groups of well-defined,
easily classifiable fish jump into the fossil record seemingly from nowhere:
mysteriously, suddenly, full-formed, and in a most un-Darwinian way. And before
them are maddening, illogical gaps where their ancestors should be" (p.
9-10).
At the end of each geological era there are massive extinctions of animals in
the fossil record, sometimes wiping out more than half of the species on the
planet. Two of the major extinctions occurred at the end of the Permian era
(c. 245 million BC) and the Cretaceous era (c. 65 million BC) which saw the
end of the dinosaurs. After these major extinctions great numbers of new species
suddenly came into existence. The suddenness of so many new species is a powerful
witness of God creating many new species to replace older ones.
Stephen Collins writes in his book As It Was In the Days of Noah:
Does anyone really believe that wagging a fin through the water will 'presto-chango'
turn a fish's fin into a leg so it can climb out on the land? Even if one wishes
to believe such a preposterous assertion, changing a fin into a limb is not
enough of a leap to do any good; the gills of the fish would need to simultaneously
transform themselves into mammalian lungs to allow such a fish to live at all
when it washed up on shore. Even though it vexes evolutionists to deal with
the facts, it should also be noted that any 'evolving' fish would also need
an instantaneous and simultaneous change of its scales to skin to survive even
a tiny amount of time out of the water!
Fred Meldau writes the following in his book Why We Believe in Creation
Not in Evolution:
All specialized organs, such as the trunk of an elephant, the spinning
apparatus of a spider, the eye of an eagle, the retractable claws of the tiger,
the beak of a woodpecker, the tongue of an anteater, the quills of a porcupine,
HAD to be created perfect and suddenly - otherwise they would never serve their
intended purpose. The evolutionary idea of gradual development through 'random
changes' through long ages of time can in no wise account for the facts of a
practical, workable world (p.98).
· Evolution
violates the second law of thermodynamics.
Evolution teaches the exact opposite of what the second law of thermodynamics
says. It states that all things will descend into DISORDER rather than order,
if left to themselves. The state of a teenager's bedroom is ample evidence of
this law in action. Fred Meldau writes the following about this law:
This law infers and involves the fact of 'the universal tendency toward
decay' - and all nature demonstrates it! Now note this well: The Second Law
of Thermodynamics infers and teaches EXACTLY OPPOSITE TO WHAT EVOLUTION TEACHES.
It demands universal decay rather than universal development. Careful, honest
observers admit that the law of nature in both the inorganic and the organic
world tends toward degeneracy rather than toward improvement. This second Law
of Thermodynamics is of universal application. The very universe itself is 'running
down.' Instead of the sun and stars conserving their energy, they are gradually
losing it, though it is a very slow process (ibid, p.75).
In his book The Crumbling Theory of Evolution J.W.G. Johnson writes:
Evolution
requires the universe to run uphill. It requires random
molecules to assemble themselves into organised and increasingly complex systems.
Evolution requires the simple to bring forth the complex. It requires jellyfish
to transition into humans. Even more than this, it requires hydrogen gas to
evolve into thinking man by purely natural processes. Living systems (plants
and animals) are extremely complex and highly organised arrangements of matter.
How could they arise from disordered molecules of matter? The 2nd Law rules
that order cannot spontaneously arise from disorder, nor the complex arise from
the simple (p.13-14).
The theory of evolution is nothing but that a theory. It fails to stand
up to the basic procedures of scientific method yet most scientists support
it with religious fervour. They have been influenced by Satan, the prince of
the power of the air (Ephesians
2:2), to reject God and find an alternative
method to try and do away with the need of a Creator.
· Who
wrote the software, the coded instructions called DNA, that run all living beings?
As complex a thing as a computer is, it can't
run without software. Software programs are a set of step-by-step instructions
that tell the computer how to do the things that it does. Someone has to write
those step-by-step instructions in just the right order for it to function properly.
It takes intelligence to develop the right instructions and put them in the
right order for a computer to do exactly what the programmer wants it to do.
It takes reams of written
code written just right to make a robot walk and grab things, even in a basic
way. Voice dictation programs that recognize words a user speaks into a microphone
and put them on the computer screen are extremely long and complex and are nowhere
near as good as the human mind in recognizing words and language, even with
humans of primitive tribes. Speech is only one extremely complex function of
the human body. There are all the other complex functions such as digestion,
respiration and circulation that go on in our bodies. The amazing DNA codes
in our body run these complex functions without us even having to think about
them.
Humans beings and all other life forms can't run without the software to make
their bodies run. In human beings there are nearly 100 000 genes on our chromosomes.
The genes account for specific characteristics such as eye colour and shape
of body parts, etc. Each of these 100 000 genes are a separate, complex written
program. Even if our bodies could have come into being through natural processes
how could the software to run our bodies have written themselves without some
great intelligence to write those instructions?
That is what scientists simply cannot explain and what random selection
cannot reproduce. Professor Davies admits: In a living organism we see the power
of software, or information processing, refined to an incredible degree...The
problem of the origin of life reduces to one of understanding how encoded software
emerged spontaneously from hardware. How did it happen? How did nature 'go digital'?...It
is like trying to explain how a kite can evolve into a radio-controlled aircraft.
Can the laws of nature as we presently comprehend them account for such a transition?
I do not believe they can" (Good News, July/August 2000, p.22).
· Symbiosis
Symbiosis is another marvel in nature which witnesses
against the theory of evolution. Some creatures both literally need each other
to survive. So which came first if they need the other to survive? This kind
of symbiosis is best reflected in the old phrase - Which came first
the chicken or the egg? We read the following about symbiosis in the UCG
booklet Creation
or Evolution?:
According to the theory of evolution, all animal life on earth has evolved
from a common ancestor. This process has supposedly occurred over an immense
time and followed a step-by-step sequence from primitive to advanced forms of
life. This would mean plant life first appeared and developed, followed much
later by the appearance of animal life. This idea is contradicted by the fossil
record, which shows complex plant and animal life first appearing together in
the geologic column during the Cambrian era.
Another obstacle to this theory is the interdependent relationships between
living things, called symbiosis, in which completely different forms of life
depend on each other to exist
How can plants that need certain animals
to survive have existed before those animals appeared in the first place? And
how do animals that need other animals to survive arrive without the other creature
already being there? An example of beneficial symbiosis (called mutualism) is
between algae and the fungus of lichens. While fungi provide vital protection
and moisture to algae, the algae nourish the fungi with photosynthetic nutrients
that keep them alive
Another remarkable
form of symbiosis is the relationship between bees and plants. While collecting
the precious nectar that provides their hives with food, bees pollinate dozens
of species of flowers and agricultural crops. Without this vital pollination,
orchards could produce little if any fruit, and fruit trees would not survive
for long. How can these plants exist without first being pollinated by bees?
On the other hand, how could bees exist without first being provided with the
necessary nectar as food? Clearly, both life forms depend on each other for
their existence. In addition, the bee has to carry out pollination in a precisely
specific way for the process to work. If the bee visited other species of flowers
at random, pollination could not occur, since the pollen of one species of flower
does not fertilize another species. Somehow the bee knows to visit only one
plant species at a time and at the right season (p.22).
· Where
did the two sexes of male and female come from?
The ultimate in symbiosis is seen through virtually
the whole animal kingdom with sexual reproduction. How could evolution produce
two different sexes that both need each other in order to continue the species?
Here is one fairytale explanation that the Guinness Encyclopaedia puts forth
as to how the two sexes originated:
It is possible that sex may have originated in the engulfing of one organism
by another in a kind of cannibalism. An engorged organism with double the genetic
material would then divide in two to relieve itself. In time an alternating
pattern of single and double units of genetic material would succeed each other
until the situation was reached where the norm would be the double system
(p.111).
Two sexes originating from a form of cannibalism? Can you believe the fairytale
language that some of these evolutionists use?
Here then evolution faces an impasse. Evolutionists believe there was
a time when there was no reproduction by sex. They teach that reproduction by
means other than sex (even though there are mutations) maintains 'a fairly constant
heredity' that is, succession of all of life with very few changes. HOW
DID SEX GET STARTED? Running in the deep groove of asexual uniformity, there
was no chance. through natural causes, ever to get out of that groove. To believe
that both 'male' and 'female' elements developed [at the same time] by 'chance
mutations' is an absurdity. Obviously, sex
had to be PLANNED, and designed
and created that way (Why We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution, p.289).
So what is the lesson to be learned from the symbiosis God has created in nature
and in our own species with male and female? It is simply that we need each
other - we need to co-operate with one another to survive and live peacefully.
· Man
acts with intelligence while animals act with instinct.
The fundamental difference between man and animals
is that animals are guided by instinct a predefined pattern of behaviour
while man has a mind and acts with intelligence. Fred Meldau make the
following comments on this fundamental difference:
Can anyone explain the secrets of heredity or of instinct, that amazing
property of animals which acts like intelligence but is not intelligence as
we know it, but which enables certain creatures to do what man with all his
intelligence can not do!
Dr Irston Barnes
speaks of the 'fixity of
character' in animals and plants that assures the maintenance of the 'balance
of nature'. He says, 'Each animal is chained
to an instinctive pattern
of behaviour
Thus a hawk is powerless to alter its tastes or it manners'
(ibid, p.261,106).
In the UCG booklet Creation
or Evolution? we read of this major
difference between man and the animals:
If humans are the result of evolution continually reinforcing characteristics
that offer a survival advantage while eliminating those that hinder perpetuation,
how can we explain a human infant? Among thousands of species the newly born
(or newly hatched) are capable of survival within a matter of days or, in some
cases, only minutes. Many never even see their parents. Yet, among humans, an
infant is utterly helpless-not for days but for up to several years after birth
(p.2).
In his book The
Missing Dimension in Sex Hebert W. Armstrong wrote:
Animals are born with instinct. They need little or no teaching. Ever
see a little calf born? The mother cow does not need to call an obstetrical
physician or go to a hospital for the delivery of her calf. As soon as it is
born, the calf will begin to stagger to its feet, while the cow just stupidly
stands waiting. She does not need to teach her calf how to walk, how to take
its food, how to do anything. A little wobbly and unsteady at first, the calf
is up and walking in just a minute or two. Now how long does it take a human
infant to learn to walk? Usually a year -- and often more. But the newborn calf
walks almost immediately. No one teaches it. THE CALF HAS INSTINCT. And where
does it start walking? It has no instruction from anyone. It starts walking
for its first "dinner." It knows where to go. And the mother cow just
stands stupidly still while her calf sucks its milk
The newborn human does not get up and walk immediately to its food. The
tiny baby is absolutely helpless. It has a few instinctive reflexes, but no
instinct, in the strict sense of the word. It has MIND -- but at birth there
is NO KNOWLEDGE as yet in its mind. It knows virtually nothing at birth. It
must be taught! It needs parents to teach it! It matures so very much more slowly
than animals! Yet its potentiality is infinitely higher!
The human mind can know, think, reason, plan and carry out its plans to
execution. It can invent and produce instruments by which it may acquire knowledge
of the vast universe, or of the minutest particle. By developing rockets and
computers, man is able to send astronauts to the moon and bring them back alive
(Does God Exist, Herbert
W. Armstrong, p.7).
We have minds with the power to choose between right
and wrong. We can think up new ideas, new concepts, imagine and create. We can
appreciate beautiful art, music, humor and creativity. We have the ability to
wonder about himself, our origin and our future. We have the gift of consciousness
and emotional self-awareness that no animal has.
· Sexual
differences between man and animals
An important area that shows the difference between
instinct in animal and mind in man is that of the sexual differences between
man and the animals.
The menstrual period in women occurs roughly about once a month when an unfertilized
ovum is released from her ovaries. Female animals have a rutting period much
less frequent. In dogs, for example, females have a rutting time about every
six to eight months when an ovum is released. At all other times, female animals
are virtually sexless! The female does not allow the breeding act, and the male
animal seldom attempts it.
When the animal is "in heat," the sexual organs secrete substances
which release an odor. This excites the animals automatically to have sexual
intercourse and breed. When "in heat," the female animal is beside
herself with desire for mating and she knows no rest until she is relieved by
copulation from the male of her kind and any mating between animals in this
situation ALWAYS results in pregnancy in the female animal. With animals there
is no marriage, home or family relationship. Females are sexless between rutting
periods!
With humans sex is completely
different. Between the age of puberty and the time of menopause -- roughly
between ages fourteen and forty-four, or a duration of approximately thirty
years -- women have the monthly period (approximately each twenty-eight days)
when they menstruate. The presence of an ovum in a Fallopian tube (when it is
ready to be fertilized) makes little or no difference in either a woman's desire
for, or reluctance against sexual intercourse (The
Missing Dimension in Sex, Herbert W. Armstrong).
Notice God's concern for mankind in designing sex in humans so that babies are
only born when women are best able to physically care for them. After a woman
reaches her mid-forties God stops the process so women are not too old to have
to care for their own children.
Although marital coitus should never, of course, occur during menstruation
[Leviticus
20:18], there is NO TIME during the month
when a women is virtually sexless -- when sex functioning goes dormant -- when
she is unable to engage in coitus with her husband. She is as much capable of
coitus at one time as another. God made WOMAN, as well as MAN, on a plane infinitely
higher than animals! He created SEX in HUMANS as a means of bestowing reciprocal
LOVE. He created women so that their sex organs may be used for the purpose
of sharing LOVE when pregnancy is virtually IMPOSSIBLE (The
Missing Dimension in Sex, Herbert W. Armstrong).
· Major
differences between man and the apes show man did not evolve from apes
We have already looked at the differences between
the instinct in animals and mind in humans. This profound difference also exists
between man and the apes (primates). Along with their instinct God has created
in animals a limited personality that has a certain capacity to make choices
of a non-moral nature since they are guided by instinct. They do not have emotional
self-awareness as we humans have.
The profound sexual differences noted above also apply between humans and apes.
Desmond Morris in his book Naked Ape describes a number of differences
between humans and apes such as the placement of the sexual organs as features
which seem indicate that humans [in marriage] were designed for face-to-face
sexual bonding rather than the opposite style of copulation in the animal kingdom.
Another obvious difference to the physical appearance between man and the apes
is that man does not have a hairy coat like apes and monkeys. Man is naked compared
to the apes - another of the features Desmond Morris sees as part of the design
for human sexual bonding.
Another profound difference between man and the apes is the gift of speech and
language, even amongst primitive tribes of humans. A certain small area
of the cortex. In the frontal lobe, called 'Broca's convolution,' is man's SPEECH
centre; monkeys and apes DO NOT HAVE THIS AREA AT ALL" (Why We Believe
in Creation Not in Evolution, p.241).
Another major difference is the relative size of man's brain. 'The brain
of the most incompetent normal man is TWICE as big as the most accomplished
ape.' And the average size brain of main is 'THREE times as large as the average
size brain of an ape' relative to body sizes (ibid, p.241). This difference
in brain size is only a very small part of the reason for the awesome difference
in intelligence between man and the apes. The spirit in man (1
Corinthians 2:11) that God has given him
is what gives man the gift of mind power and emotional self-awareness.
Austin H. Clark,
Smithsonian Institute biologist, said: "Man is NOT an ape and in spite
of the similarity between them there is not the slightest evidence that man
is descended from an ape... While man's bodily structure is most nearly like
that of the man-like apes, yet all the early remains of prehistoric man so far
discovered are distinctly those of man or are the misinterpreted fragments of
apes. NO EXISTING LINK HAS EVER BEEN FOUND. There is no fossil evidence whatever
that the most ancient man was not a man. There are no such things as missing
links. Missing links are misinterpretations. Fossil skulls which have been dug
up and advanced as missing links, showing connections between man and monkey,
have all been shown as misinterpretations" (ibid, p.316).
Fred Meldau writes the following on the evidence for dating when mankind first
appeared on earth and its closeness to the Bible's record that man was first
created 6 000 years ago:
Prehistoric men did not appear until long after the great dinosaurs had
disappeared...Palaeontologists know that fossils of men and of dinosaurs are
not found in the same geological period. The fossils of dinosaurs come in early
periods, the fossils of men much later
As we seek to consider the subject
of the Age of Mankind objectively, we are struck with a fact of outstanding
importance:
(1) Man's 'written history' - when man began to write DID NOT BEGIN UNTIL
ABOUT 5,000 years ago. That would be about 3,000 B.C. This remarkable fact -
that 'written history' begins from 3000 to 3500 B.C. conforms closely to the
Bible chronology of mankind!
(2) How can one explain the phenomenon of hundreds of highly developed
languages, the world over, even among primitive tribes, IF language evolved
slowly through the ages? The evidence is all tribes and races obtained the use
of language SUDDENLY; and that fits in with the Bible record of Divine creation
(3) In addition to the evidence of 'writing' we have another corroborative
fact: Archaeological evidence indicates that 'Food production probably began
in the Near East somewhere between 6,000 and 5,000 B.C.' 'The earliest village-culture
materials now known start about 5,000 B.C.' By 'food producing' economy, palaeontologists
mean, 'men began producing their food, instead of simply collecting it.'
(ibid, p.324).
The Bible is correct when it says that man was created by God 6 000 years ago
from the dust of the ground and that he did not evolve from apes. God created
mankind in His own image and put him in dominion over all the animals (Genesis
1:26) on earth. Man has been given the
gift of a mind to choose right from wrong, and with God's Holy Spirit develop
God's character, so one day, just as a lowly caterpillar transforms into a beautiful
butterfly, so too, we can be transformed and become powerful spirit beings in
God's own family (Philippians
3:21).
7] Answered prayer.
The most personal proof
of God's existence is that of answered prayer (Matthew
7:7-11, 1 John 3:22).
Miracles do happen and prayer, in one sense, is like regularly asking God to
perform little miracles for us. Virtually all people who have been in the church
for years have stories of clear, miraculous answers to prayers. When you experience
clear, undeniable answers to prayer over the course of time one's belief in
the existence of a supreme, powerful God who loves each of us personally is
strengthened.
Some of those miracles include help in turning around powerful sins and addictions, miraculous protection, intervention in work and personal situations, selecting just the right person for you to marry and then there is the miracle of one's eyes being opened up to the truth of God and being drawn by God into His church.
You can experience for yourself the proof of answered prayer by praying to God on a regular basis. If you ask according to His will (1 John 3:22) and believe in faith (James 1:5-6) you'll receive what you have asked for. God can perform some wonderful things for you if your faith is a living one (James 2:14-26) where you have a genuine desire to obey God. Sometimes He says no for our good (James 4:3) and to build our character. Other times He will delay the answer and then answer with perfect timing later (Luke 18:1-8). God really does answer prayers and does little miracles every day in the lives of God's people.
Two
other points that prove God's existence are fulfilled prophecies and His way
of life that works. We will look at these two important points in lesson two
where we look at the question "Is the Bible True?".
In Psalm 14:1
we read, "The FOOL has said in his heart, There is no God! and in
Romans
1:20 we read, For the invisible things
of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by
the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are
without excuse. The evidence of God's existence is all around us, in the
heavens, all throughout nature and in the wonders of our own human bodies. God
truly does exist!
·
We know the universe had a beginning
because radioactive elements like uranium would have turned to lead long ago
if the universe has always existed.
· The
fact that the universe is expanding points us back to the fact that the universe
had a beginning the big bang. It takes an almighty Creator
to bring a universe into existence where no matter existed before (Genesis
1:1).
2] The wonders of design
in the universe
· The
Earth's tilt, rotation and distance from the Sun are just right for supporting
life and we have an ideal atmosphere with just the right proportions of oxygen
and nitrogen. Our atmosphere has an amazingly thin ozone layer which blocks
out deadly long UV rays, without which, no life could exist.
· The moon's distance is just
the right distance to create gentle enough tides which are sufficient to rejuvenate
(with oxygen) the waters of the oceans due to the movement it creates.
· The awesome size and power
of the universe staggers the imagination. The evidence of design is seen in
the orderly nature of the motion of the stars and galaxies, not to mention the
beauty and orderly patterns we see in some of the colourful nebulas and constellations.
· Gravity pulls the planets
toward the sun while inertia keeps them in motion once they have been put in
motion. Who gave the stars and planets the original push and what keeps them
going? Without a Creator who gives the planets in our solar system a push before
they start to slow down they would all fall into the Sun in time like the Mir
space station fell to earth.
· We see design in the wonders
and mysteries of the atom and the harmony of the laws of the universe. The stars
in the heaven and all of matter follow laws of physics and chemistry, etc. which
are totally predictable and unfailing. From where did these laws come from if
not from God?
3] Water
· The
amazing properties of water show evidence of design. There is water's versatility
as ice, steam, clouds, snow and rain.
· There
is water being a curious exception to natural law by being heaviest at 4 degrees
centigrade and expanding when becoming ice which prevents lakes from freezing
solid.
· There
is the beauty and miracle of snowflakes. Billions fall each winter without one
ever being identical! What greater testament is there to an incredibly creative
God?
4] The wonders of design
in nature
· The
law of biogenesis states that life can ONLY come from pre-existing life. Inanimate
matter can't suddenly become living so it takes the Living God to have created
life.
· Viruses
are mostly poisons which is a strange first step if evolution was true and viruses
were the first forms of life.
· The
building blocks of life cells are incredibly complex and far too
complex to have come into being through evolution which relies on positive random
changes.
· We
have the amazing balance of nature where plants, through the mysterious process
of photosynthesis to produce food, take in carbon dioxide and expel oxygen while
animals breathe in oxygen and carbon dioxide. How could such an amazing system
like that happen by chance?
· There
are the marvels of design all throughout nature which show that there has to
be a great Designer who designed it all. Some of those incredible designs we
see in nature include:
· The
unique way insects breathe where each cell essentially has its own private
lung.
· The
flying wonders we know as birds which are perfectly aerodynamically designed
for flight with hollow bones, a strong large heart that beats hundreds of times
a second, wings and feathers and a remarkable breathing system.
· The
perfect helicopter the hummingbird which can fly backwards and
sideways and beats its wings up to 75 times a second.
· The
amazing sight of hawks and owls.
· The
unbelievable sonar system of bats.
· The
jumping ability of grasshoppers and fleas.
· The
natural lighting system of fireflies and deep sea creatures.
· The
amazing ability of animals like electric eels to produce electricity.
· The
chameleon with its incredible ability to change its colour.
· The
ability of salmon to jump 10 feet up rapids and their amazing sense of smell
which helps them find the exact place where they were born up to 1000 miles
inland.
· Evolution
in billions of years could never come up with the amazing metamorphosis of butterflies
from caterpillars and tadpoles (with gills) to frogs (with lungs). In the case
of butterflies, the total transformation from the lowly greedy caterpillar into
the beautiful butterfly is a lesson of the reality of the transformation of
man into the spirit born children of God at the resurrection (John
3:3-7, 1 Corinthians 15:42-44;
Philippians 3:21).
· The
beauty we see in all throughout nature in birds, in tropical fish and coral
reefs, in gemstones and in the colour of rainbows is testimony to the great
Artist that designed it all.
· All
creatures are highly specialized and perfectly adapted for their environment
from the cactus in the desert, the eagle in the air and the penguin in the Antarctic.
5] The wonders of design
in man
· There
are all the wonders of design in man's own body such as all the various systems
which work so harmoniously together such as the digestive system, the immune
system, the respiration system and the circulation system (Psalm
139:14).
· There
is the miracle of conception. From a single fertilized cell grows a new human
of around 30 trillion cells with all the necessary structures and systems working
perfectly.
· There
is the design and shape of our red blood cells which have no nucleus. There
is also the design of blood clotting which stops us from bleeding to death when
we are cut.
· Our
eyes are another incredible wonder which have a lens with no blood vessels,
are flexible and can change their shape to focus perfectly on objects at any
distance.
· There
are also the mechanical marvels of the heart, hands, ear and our which
point to the great Designer.
6] Creation or Evolution?
· Natural
selection only selects the best of existing traits it does not produce
new ones.
· Mutations
only produces varieties in the same species it doesn't create new species.
· The
result of mutations are almost always bad. As mutations are almost invariably
inferior to the original stock this would constitute Survival of the Unfit.
· Evolution
teaches the exact opposite of what the second law of thermodynamics says. It
states that all things will descend into DISORDER rather than order, if left
to themselves.
· Even
if our bodies could have come into being through natural processes, how could
the software to run our bodies have written themselves in our DNA without some
great intelligence to write those instructions?
· Symbiosis
is another marvel in nature which witnesses against the theory of evolution.
Some creatures both literally need each other to survive. So which came first
if they need the other to survive?
· The
ultimate in symbiosis is seen through the whole animal kingdom with sexual reproduction.
How could evolution produce two different sexes that both need each other in
order to continue the species?
· The
fundamental difference between man and animals is that animals are guided by
instinct a predefined pattern of behaviour while man has a mind
and acts with intelligence. Our mindpower and the fact that, of all creatures,
we have emotional self-awareness is made possible through the gift of the spirit
in man that God has put in him (1 Corinthians
2:11).
· There
are also sexual differences between man and animals. Sex is only for reproduction
with animals. When they go on heat once or twice a year females
always get pregnant when mating occurs. The rest of the year there is no sex
or interest in it. In marriage, couples can have sex at virtually anytime yet
pregnancy can only happen on a handful of days each year. Sex in humans is not
merely for reproduction like in animals but is designed as a pleasure bond between
a husband and wife.
· There
are major differences that show that man is not descended from the apes. There
is the difference in animal instinct in apes and mind in humans, the sexual
differences mentioned above, the lack of body hair with humans, the much larger
brain in humans and the lack of the Broca's convulsion in apes which gives man
the gift of speech.
· The
Bible is correct when it says that man was created by God 6 000 years ago from
the dust of the ground and that he did not evolve from apes. God created mankind
in His own image and put him in dominion over all the animals on earth (Genesis
1:26). Man has been given the gift of a
mind to choose right from wrong, and with God's Holy Spirit develop God's character
and one day be born into God's family.
7] Answered prayer
· The most
personal proof of God's existence is that of answered prayer (Matthew
7:7-11, 1 John 3:22).
When you experience clear, undeniable answers to prayer over the course of time
one's belief in the existence of a supreme, powerful God who loves each of us
personally is strengthened.
· For
the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen,
being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead,
so that they are without excuse (Romans
1:20). The evidence of God's existence
is all around us, in the heavens, all throughout nature and in the wonders of
our own human bodies.